1. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    16 Feb '12 06:27
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Natural selection is not evolution you idiot. 😏
    From the same source you quote:

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/evolution
    evolution
    Biology . change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.
  2. Windsor, Ontario
    Joined
    10 Jun '11
    Moves
    3829
    16 Feb '12 06:30
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Darwin thought that adaptation by natural selection could result in evolution.
    However, this theory has never been proved.
    yes it has. see a couple examples in this thread.
  3. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    16 Feb '12 07:05
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    From the same source you quote:

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/evolution
    evolution
    Biology . change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.
    But this evolution does not actually happen. It is only in theory. The
    definition is based on the possibility that Darwin's theory that natural
    selection may result in evolution is correct. However, it is not correct
    for no kind of animal or plant has ever been shown to have evolved
    into another kind of animal or plant. It just doesn't happen, period.
    End of story.
    😏
  4. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    16 Feb '12 07:481 edit
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    But this evolution does not actually happen.
    So you are denying that there is a "change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation"? If you are, then you don't know what natural selection is. If you aren't then you didn't read the definition that I quoted.
    I think the real problem is that some pastor has told you that 'evolution' is an evil word so you refuse to accept the definition.
  5. The Ghost Bishop
    Joined
    11 Oct '11
    Moves
    877
    16 Feb '12 07:481 edit
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    no kind of animal or plant has ever been shown to have evolved
    into another kind of animal or plant. It just doesn't happen, period.
    End of story.
    😏
    You need to re-read the story.
    Examples are listed below with scientific studies that slap your ignorant face.

    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/06/0604_wirealgae.html

    http://sci.waikato.ac.nz/evolution/plantEvolution.shtml

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_plant_evolution

    http://www.biologyreference.com/Ep-Fl/Evolution-of-Plants.html

    http://www.biologie.uni-hamburg.de/b-online/e33/33.htm

    http://astrobio.net/pressrelease/3671/fungi-helped-plants-move-to-land

    There are many symbiotic relationships in nature which have been proven to have evolved into singular species. Studies in plant, fungi, bacterial, and in general eukariotic cell's has revealed the FACT that multiple species do and many times have been created from singular species. All of which maintain completely separate characteristics from their host. Take Blue Green Algae's which developed in many different ways...two of which: Spirulina on one end of the spectrum, and glyceria maxima... two completely separate species that are in two separate phylum...

    Eat your hat.



    Q
  6. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    16 Feb '12 08:051 edit
    Originally posted by PhySiQ
    You need to re-read the story.
    Examples are listed below with scientific studies that slap your ignorant face.

    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/06/0604_wirealgae.html

    http://sci.waikato.ac.nz/evolution/plantEvolution.shtml

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_plant_evolution

    http://www.biologyreference.com/Ep-Fl/Evolution-of-Pl two completely separate species that are in two separate phylum...

    Eat your hat.



    Q
    When an idiot like you and a moran like me get together, there is no meeting
    of the minds, for I see no evolution. 😏

    So now we can forget about the apes for the theory now is that we evolved
    from slimy green algae. Haven't we heard this before?
  7. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    16 Feb '12 13:17
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    When an idiot like you and a moran like me get together, there is no meeting
    of the minds, for I see no evolution. 😏

    So now we can forget about the apes for the theory now is that we evolved
    from slimy green algae. Haven't we heard this before?
    You look the truth in the eye and see fantasy because of your cognitive dissonance, you cannot accept reality because it collides with your religious dogma.

    Your Carma just ran over your Dogma.
  8. Joined
    04 May '11
    Moves
    13736
    16 Feb '12 13:37
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    When an idiot like you and a moran like me get together, there is no meeting
    of the minds, for I see no evolution. 😏

    So now we can forget about the apes for the theory now is that we evolved
    from slimy green algae. Haven't we heard this before?
    Are you denying evolution in general or only that humans evolved from apes? There's this fallacy called "moving goalposts"...
  9. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    16 Feb '12 15:26
    Originally posted by Vartiovuori
    Are you denying evolution in general or only that humans evolved from apes? There's this fallacy called "moving goalposts"...
    I have said many times evolution is only a theory and does not occur in real
    life. Adaptation under the guise of natural selection has been redefined to
    mean evolution in a different way than originally intended because there is
    no evidence for real evolution which is only in the minds of those that do
    not want to believe in the Creator. I say again, "Evolution does not exist."
  10. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    16 Feb '12 15:521 edit
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    I have said many times evolution is only a theory and does not occur in real
    life. Adaptation under the guise of natural selection has been redefined to
    mean evolution in a different way than originally intended because there is
    no evidence for real evolution which is only in the minds of those that do
    not want to believe in the Creator. I say again, "Evolution does not exist."
    So in your mind, if a new species arises, say a new lizard adapted to high desert, it does not come from a previous species but because your god wanted it that way, your god has its metaphorical hand in every change happening to life forms on Earth? That would of course mean controlling the way viruses get more virulent and kill more people like the flu epidemic of 1918 that literally killed 50 million people. Is that the kind of control your god assumes over the life forms on Earth? Nothing happens to change things unless your god decrees it?
  11. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    16 Feb '12 19:31
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    So in your mind, if a new species arises, say a new lizard adapted to high desert, it does not come from a previous species but because your god wanted it that way, your god has its metaphorical hand in every change happening to life forms on Earth? That would of course mean controlling the way viruses get more virulent and kill more people like the flu epi ...[text shortened]... sumes over the life forms on Earth? Nothing happens to change things unless your god decrees it?
    You know better than that and you know why you do not want to accept the
    truth. The idea of evolution is mainly based on chance happenings and any
    information requires an intelligent source so that rules out evolution doesn't
    it? The intelligence source is the designer and maker we call God.

    Intelligent information that can direct the reproduction and adaptive changes
    in living things does not take place by chance. Evolution is dumb and has no
    intelligence and operates only by chance. It is the Creator God that put the
    information in the living things that allows them to make adaptive changes
    and reproduce after their own kind. This was done for each kind when God
    created them just as the Holy Bible says. These information programs in the
    genes or DNA does not allow for the evolution of one kind into another kind.
    So there are only adaptive changes and not evolutionary changes and thus,
    we can dismiss evolution as false since God has made sure it does not occur.

    The Creator God designed the system to operate without His constant input.
    It is an automatic system. The problem is that we were suppose to be a
    loving and controlling agent in this system. God programmed many of the
    creatures with instincts to do what they needed to do so the learning process
    was reduced. In our case, God wanted us to be able to love Him, so He had
    to give us more free will, since love can not be forced. The drawback was
    that God had to give us the ability to disobey and reject Him. When we
    disobeyed Him, that messed up everything and as a result we have the
    messed up world we live in today.
  12. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    17 Feb '12 02:56
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    You know better than that and you know why you do not want to accept the
    truth. The idea of evolution is mainly based on chance happenings and any
    information requires an intelligent source so that rules out evolution doesn't
    it? The intelligence source is the designer and maker we call God.

    Intelligent information that can direct the reproduction a ...[text shortened]... d Him, that messed up everything and as a result we have the
    messed up world we live in today.
    Then why did he/she/it kill the dinosaurs?
  13. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    17 Feb '12 04:00
    Originally posted by Vartiovuori
    Evolution = adaptation. It's as simple as that.
    Not true. Adaptation does not allow for the change of a kind to a different
    kind. However, evolution says that all life forms descended from a common
    ancestor, which violates God's law for how adaptation is to work. In other
    words, it can't happen because God has put a law in place to prevent it.
    Adaptation by natural selection falls way short of being evolution. It is still
    just a method of adaptation.
  14. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    17 Feb '12 04:02
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Then why did he/she/it kill the dinosaurs?
    Man sinned.
  15. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    The Axe man
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    102823
    17 Feb '12 04:06
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    You look the truth in the eye and see fantasy because of your cognitive dissonance, you cannot accept reality because it collides with your religious dogma.

    Your Carma just ran over your Dogma.
    Nevertheless his Dogma still shouldn't have been chasing it. And that ol' rascall seems better than before the accident ...
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree