Evolution is Dead

Proof the Earth is about 6000 years old:

YouTube

A modern young David slaying the Goliath of evolution.
He cuts the head off.
There is no need for creationists to prove anything now.

Originally posted by RJHinds
There is no need for creationists to prove anything now.

There never was. 🙂

Originally posted by RJHinds
Proof the Earth is about 6000 years old:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L72h2R4FO0k

A modern young David slaying the Goliath of evolution.
He cuts the head off.
There is no need for creationists to prove anything now.

You're so dumb you don't realise when your beliefs are being mocked through parody.

Did you spot his username?

ExChristian88

Originally posted by wolfgang59
You're so dumb you don't realise when your beliefs are being mocked through parody.

Did you spot his username?

ExChristian88

That proves nothing because his presentation was accurate. I am open to hear you refute what he said. I don't think you can. Are you up to the challenge?

Originally posted by RJHinds
That proves nothing because his presentation was accurate. I am open to hear you refute what he said. I don't think you can. Are you up to the challenge?

Accurate?

Dont you get it? It was a joke

Originally posted by karoly aczel
Accurate?

Dont you get it? It was a joke

Yes, it is a joke on the evolutionists. It is making fun of the evolutionists. Don't you get it? Anyway you have not refuted anything he has said. So do you have anything to contribute that is worth considering?

Originally posted by RJHinds
Yes, it is a joke on the evolutionists. It is making fun of the evolutionists. Don't you get it? Anyway you have refuted anything he has said. So do you have anything to contribute that is worth considering?

I was trying to point out that the guy who wrote that was probably joking .

What can I contribute to this sublimely titled thread?

I could juxtapose that title with my own, 6 year old, retort and say "God is Dead", but you really couldn't get into that spirit of that line of dialogue (I'm assuming) as say a buddhist ... or just about anyone else for that matter. Your one pointed focus makes it impossible for you to consider things like paradoxes, and such which requires you to embrace at least two points of view ... so I wonder. What makes you so anti-evolution?
You scared your world view might get shattered? I would think this is a good thing. I've had my view smashed a few times and I can tell you , it was a very illuminating, uplifting experience every time 😉


edit: and no, I am not in league with satan in any way 😉

Originally posted by karoly aczel
I was trying to point out that the guy who wrote that was probably joking .

What can I contribute to this sublimely titled thread?

I could juxtapose that title with my own, 6 year old, retort and say "God is Dead", but you really couldn't get into that spirit of that line of dialogue (I'm assuming) as say a buddhist ... or just about anyone else ing experience every time 😉


edit: and no, I am not in league with satan in any way 😉

I know the young fellow on the video was joking. He was making fun of evolutionists. That was plain to see for any sane person not under the influence of Satan's lies. However,

Proof the Earth is about 6000 years old:

YouTube

Still waiting for the refutation.

Originally posted by RJHinds
That proves nothing because his presentation was accurate. I am open to hear you refute what he said. I don't think you can. Are you up to the challenge?

sure. present your case and we'll tear it down for you.

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
sure. present your case and we'll tear it down for you.

Proof the Earth is about 6000 years old:

YouTube

Still waiting for the refutation.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Proof the Earth is about 6000 years old:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L72h2R4FO0k

Still waiting for the refutation.

still waiting for you to make a case. i haven't heard any arguments from you yet. anytime you're ready, go right ahead.

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
still waiting for you to make a case. i haven't heard any arguments from you yet. anytime you're ready, go right ahead.

He has one argument, one statement really, not an argument, 'god did it'.

He is so dim he doesn't realize that kid's video is a parody. He can't tell real from not real. Pretty clear about that.

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
still waiting for you to make a case. i haven't heard any arguments from you yet. anytime you're ready, go right ahead.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun

From the article the main figures we need to consider are:
1. Sun fusion rate - 620 million metric tons
2. Mass-energy conversion rate - 4.26 million metric tons
3. Age of the Sun - 5.57 billion years
4. Mass of sun today - 2×10^30 kilograms

To determine if the kid is right we need to calculate how big the Sun should have been 5.57 billion years ago. The kid said the sun was 6 billion years old verses 5.57 billion years old. The only other figure he stated was 5 million tons of hydrogen every second, which does appear to be an over-estimate of the 4.26 million tons stated by wikipedia. He appears to have rounded up instead of down. But the kid claims the Sun would have swallowed the Earth if it had been big enough to have had that much hydrogen a few million years ago using his figures.

So can you calculate what the mass of the Sun was 5.57 billion years ago? It is now 330,000 times bigger that the Earth, according to this article.

Originally posted by RJHinds
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun

From the article the main figures we need to consider are:
1. Sun fusion rate - 620 million metric tons
2. Mass-energy conversion rate - 4.26 million metric tons
3. Age of the Sun - 5.57 billion years
4. Mass of sun today - 2×10^30 kilograms

To determine if the kid is right we need to calculate how big the Sun ...[text shortened]... .57 billion years ago? It is now 330,000 times bigger that the Earth, according to this article.

Using the Wiki numbers for now as they look at cursory glance to be accurate...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun

A trivial calculation for anyone with any ability to do maths whatsoever will show that if the
sun is converting mass to energy at a constant rate of 4.26E9 kg/s it will lose mass at a rate
of appx...

2.556E11 kg per minute
1.534E13 kg per hour
3.681E14 kg per day
1.344E17 kg per year
1.344E20 kg per Ka
1.344E23 kg per Ma
1.344E26 kg per Ga
and 6.184E26 kg over a 4.6 Ga lifetime to present.

Present mass appx 1.9891E30 kg which means assuming a constant mass loss rate at present
levels means that the sun has lost a total of 0.031% of it's present mass.


However even a basic knowledge of stellar mechanics would tell you that stars energy output
(and rate of mass loss) is not constant and in fact increases over a stars lifetime.

Thus the historic rates would have been lower and thus the total mass loss to date would also
be correspondingly lower.


EDIT: I should note however that the sun does have the additional mass loss mechanism of solar wind.
However the mass lost from this is an equally tiny proportion of the suns total mass.

Originally posted by googlefudge
Using the Wiki numbers for now as they look at cursory glance to be accurate...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun

A trivial calculation for anyone with any ability to do maths whatsoever will show that if the
sun is converting mass to energy at a constant rate of 4.26E9 kg/s it will lose mass at a rate
of appx...

2.556E11 kg per minute
1.53 ...[text shortened]... uld have been lower and thus the total mass loss to date would also
be correspondingly lower.

You are trying to answer the wrong question. The question is how big was the Sun 4.57 billion years ago?