Originally posted by ua41Does not evolution proclaim that all life came from one original blob, or whatever it was, form of life?
I don't get it. Either of these perspectives show nothing to contradict god using evolution-
you believe in a god who has takes control over everything and directs the course of evolution
you believe in a god who allows for free will, but still directs the course of evolution
or you believe in a god who allows for free will but doesn't direct the course of ...[text shortened]... just want to know why god and evolution are incompatible. Did I miss something critical here?
First of all that was impossible and second it completely contradicts the Bibles explination of all life. It says clearly God created life, all forms, and all according to it's "Kind".
1.Genesis 1:11
Then God said, “Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds.” And it was so.
2.Genesis 1:12
The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
3.Genesis 1:21
So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living and moving thing with which the water teems, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
4.Genesis 1:24
And God said, “Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind.” And it was so.
5.Genesis 1:25
God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
1 edit
Originally posted by galveston75Does not the Bible say we came from one original blob (God)?
Does not evolution proclaim that all life came from one original blob, or whatever it was, form of life?
First of all that was impossible and second it completely contradicts the Bibles explination of all life. It says clearly God created life, all forms, and all according to it's "Kind".
1.Genesis 1:11
Then God said, “Let the land produce vegetati ...[text shortened]... creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
So god created things according to it's kind.
And it took specific days for these separate kinds of life.
You've got plants on a certain day and other creatures on a certain day.
Sounds like evolution to me
Edit: Unless we're supposed to take the Bible literally. In that case, I'll go throw rocks at my neighbors.
Originally posted by RJHindsWhy would I bother with a link?
You don't like it, but its better evidence against evolution than any link you
atheist have given me for the support for evolution, which I still
believes does not occur. Its only a word that includes adaptation,
mutation, etc. to make it seem like important knowledge, when in
reality, it is only science fiction.
The internet is full of complete nutters, so if you want a link to some crap about the end of the world or the flatness of the earth, you'll find it.
I would suggest a far better alternative would be a good education - including a study of science, literature and religion. Once you get that, then come back to me and we'll discuss your past ignorance.
Originally posted by galveston75First of all, why is it impossible?
Does not evolution proclaim that all life came from one original blob, or whatever it was, form of life?
First of all that was impossible and second it completely contradicts the Bibles explination of all life. It says clearly God created life, all forms, and all according to it's "Kind".
1.Genesis 1:11
Then God said, “Let the land produce vegetati ...[text shortened]... creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
Second of all, what the hell are you doing arguing against a scientific discipline with a religious text? The two are completely unrelated. And please don't tell me that the bible is the literal truth - it clearly isn't, and to believe so makes anyone a moron. I imagine you would not consider yourself a moron, so don't waste our time with moronic statements. If the bible is literally true then a whole bunch of bizarre, vile and anachronistic practices are acceptable - stoning, rape, genocide. If you don't think these are acceptable - as I would guess you don't - then how do you decide which bits you'll believe are true, and which bits you'll decide need to be ignored? If you aren't doing this, then you're lying to us and to yourself. If you are doing this, then you are being completely inconsistent.
Which is it?
Originally posted by amannionWell your turning into a real jerk with your disrespectful and rude remarks and it's not needed here if you want any decent conversations with anyone. I'm not waisting my time responding to you any more....................
First of all, why is it impossible?
Second of all, what the hell are you doing arguing against a scientific discipline with a religious text? The two are completely unrelated. And please don't tell me that the bible is the literal truth - it clearly isn't, and to believe so makes anyone a moron. I imagine you would not consider yourself a moron, so don't w ...[text shortened]... rself. If you are doing this, then you are being completely inconsistent.
Which is it?
Originally posted by galveston75Ah yes, can't argue with someone, so try ignoring them instead.
Well your turning into a real jerk with your disrespectful and rude remarks and it's not needed here if you want any decent conversations with anyone. I'm not waisting my time responding to you any more....................
Sort of proves my point really ...
Originally posted by galveston75Actually, every single scientific field is constantly changing, as we learn more about our world an universe. In other words, evolution is doing what science is supposed to do: become more and more correct as time goes on.
Oh sorry. I forget that the theory of evolution keeps changing.
Originally posted by Andrew HamiltonOf course,I know that the two hemisphere brain exists in humans. I am asking for Scientific evidence of it having evolved that way.
“...please explain what scientific evidence exists for the adaptive characteristic of two hemisphere human brain ? ...” (my emphasis)
the two hemisphere human brain exists -what do you mean?
I am guessing you do not deny that we have two hemispheres?
Well my original question about the electric eel has not been answered with any proof or even a resonable guess as to how this could have "somhow just evolved".
But instead the usual attacks come to us who know it's not a fact in the slightest degree. Those attacks come only to deflect the fact that they cannot give any proof and cling to guesses.
http://www.genesispark.org/genpark/fact/retreat.htm
Originally posted by galveston75God evolved the electric eel. There's something that we should be able to agree on (even if I do compensate my perspective a little bit)
Well my original question about the electric eel has not been answered with any proof or even a resonable guess as to how this could have "somhow just evolved".
But instead the usual attacks come to us who know it's not a fact in the slightest degree. Those attacks come only to deflect the fact that they cannot give any proof and cling to guesses.
http://www.genesispark.org/genpark/fact/retreat.htm
Originally posted by galveston75Nerves and muscles produce electric impulses already. The electric organ is just a modification of that, not something radically different.
Well my original question about the electric eel has not been answered with any proof or even a resonable guess as to how this could have "somhow just evolved".
But instead the usual attacks come to us who know it's not a fact in the slightest degree. Those attacks come only to deflect the fact that they cannot give any proof and cling to guesses.
http://www.genesispark.org/genpark/fact/retreat.htm
Eels are not the only electrogenic animals either.