1. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    19 Apr '11 20:15
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    Evolution is part of Biology, not physical science like Physics and Chemistry.
    I can not claim to know much about biology. But I just can not
    imagine a false theory like evolution, which makes an assumption that
    man came from apes and that absolutely every living thing has a
    common ancestor, could be of any importance to any science.
    It seems that it would be more of a hinderance than a help. I know
    God made man from the earth and He took a shortcut when He made
    the female. So we have the common elements that make the earth
    in our bodies with the addition of god's life-giving spirit. But He designed
    each thing he made for a specific purpose. He devised laws in the universe
    that all things must work within. We are unable to change these laws
    to suit our purposes. There is too much order in everything in the
    universe for it to come about by chance. Even most evolutionist believe
    that change does not take place outside of certain limitations. They just
    refuse to accept that these laws were created for a purpose. They
    seem to ignore the implication and just say that is the way nature works.
    I have never heard of evolution being responsible for any great scientific
    discovery. So why do we need it? We could just as easily using creation
    by God, adaptation, and mutation to explain it all.
  2. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    The Axe man
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    102809
    19 Apr '11 21:32
    Originally posted by Andrew Hamilton
    “....Just like I said: my version of the word " evolution" includes all that evolutionary theory contains but it also has a spiritual aspect. A direction, if you will. ...”

    but it doesn't need a “direction” ( let alone something “spiritual” ) in the sense that it explains what it does just fine without any sort of “direction”.

    Also, there is a ...[text shortened]... s ( just like a mindless gust of wind selects the smaller grains of sand to move them etc ) .
    For me it's logical for biological permutations to have a goal.

    I guess we subscribe to different kinds of logic.

    And in this case one of us is clearly right and one is clearly wrong.(And neither of us know who is right, unless you can prove evolution has no direction)
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree