08 May '15 08:57>3 edits
When arguing for irreducible complexity, creationists often make the case that something as complex as the eye could not have evolved in gradual steps, the idea being that you need all the parts to be in place and fully functional before you have an actual eye. Any intermediate from "no eye parts" to an "all eye parts" would be useless baggage that natural selection should have weeded out.
Note that the argument is not just that we haven't observed the evolution of the eye, but that it logically couldn't have evolved through microevolutionary processes. Which is indeed a bold argument to make, yet so easily refuted. However, if the refutation is not properly understood in context, you may find yourself saying silly things like in the following video:
YouTube : onceforgivennowfree
This demonstrates a complete failure in understanding the point made. The point of referring to now living organisms with eyes of differing complexity is not to say that the human eye necessarily has evolved through those specific steps, but to refute the claim that our eyes couldn't have evolved from simpler beginnings.
I just thought I'd put it out there to save any resident creationists the embarrassment from making the same mistake in the future. 🙂
(If the video is scrambled, try pressing the full screen view button on the lower right of the video view.)
Note that the argument is not just that we haven't observed the evolution of the eye, but that it logically couldn't have evolved through microevolutionary processes. Which is indeed a bold argument to make, yet so easily refuted. However, if the refutation is not properly understood in context, you may find yourself saying silly things like in the following video:
YouTube : onceforgivennowfree
This demonstrates a complete failure in understanding the point made. The point of referring to now living organisms with eyes of differing complexity is not to say that the human eye necessarily has evolved through those specific steps, but to refute the claim that our eyes couldn't have evolved from simpler beginnings.
I just thought I'd put it out there to save any resident creationists the embarrassment from making the same mistake in the future. 🙂
(If the video is scrambled, try pressing the full screen view button on the lower right of the video view.)