Eye evolution - Misunderstood

Originally posted by KellyJay
I read the opening and didn't see anything in it I did disagree with. I believe ID is a belief,
but also I believe evolution is too if you believe that all life shares a common ancestor.
Both of those points of views have something to prove and they look at all the evidence
trying to make the dots connect to prove their point.

With ID the believers th ...[text shortened]... ooking at what we can see today and then
making claims about what occurred in the distant past.

How about the definition of SISTER SPECIES and his limited definition of EVOLUTION? Don't you find those definitions at least somewhat misleading and deceptive? Do you believe there is such a thing as a SISTER SPECIES?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
I'm not angry at you, that's just absurd, you're not worthy of anything other than disdain. 😏

Secondly, you being a liar has nothing to do with any book. It's related to your engine use. 😏

Hallelujah!!!! Praise the Lord!!!!

All you have is ad hominem attacks. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
How about the definition of SISTER SPECIES and his limited definition of EVOLUTION? Don't you find those definitions at least somewhat misleading and deceptive? Do you believe there is such a thing as a SISTER SPECIES?

I read the opening nothing more yet.
I have never heard of the term sister species so I'll have to see how it is defined and used.