Originally posted by ThinkOfOne"Alert all commands. Calculate every possible destination along their last
Evidently we have an answer to an underlying theme of the"Theory of evolution serves Satan" thread: "Can an individual who believes [that anything that contradicts the Watchtower Society are the words of Satan] engage in a discussion based in reason?"
Based on this discussion with G75 and other discussions with him and RC, the answer would seem to be "No".
known trajectory."
1 edit
Originally posted by galveston75No it's not that exact, but it's more accurate than 20-25%, which is what you are out by.
So carbon dating is completely accurate to the day or month or year? Is it that exact?
Are you going to respond to my answers above or are you 'doing a Rob' and just ignoring them?
Originally posted by Proper Knobdoing a rob? excuse me, some of us have to work for a living! and not in a cushy office pushing pens either!
No it's not that exact, but it's more accurate than 20-25%, which is what you are out by.
Are you going to respond to my answers above or are you 'doing a Rob' and just ignoring them?
Originally posted by Proper KnobI'm not ignoring nor have I ever on purpose. I'm working today so give me a little break here ok?
No it's not that exact, but it's more accurate than 20-25%, which is what you are out by.
Are you going to respond to my answers above or are you 'doing a Rob' and just ignoring them?
2 edits
2370 BCE was around the beginning of a massive worldwide drought that hit the Middle East particularly hard which contrasted dramatically with the Flooding that had been going on for so long before. This drought created the Sahara, the Arabian desert, the desert in the North America on the Mexican-USA border, etc. The Sumerians had already fled the Flood and set up their kingdom of Uruk (Iraq). They had been writing for centuries by that time and we still have those written records.
The Mayan calendar goes back to before 3000 BCE and there were people in Peru in 3000 BCE.
It is possible that the water that had once been going to those desert regions somehow got frozen into glaciers.
http://athousandyoung.blogspot.com/2010/12/history-and-prehistory-of-everything.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norte_Chico_civilization
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uruk_period
Originally posted by RJHindsI'm sure i could trawl the internet and find numerous dates for the alleged Biblical flood. Galvo has stated on this forum that it occurred 2370 BC, he also put forward the 'flower theory'.
Here is a link that says the biblical flood date was about 3300 B.C.
http://www.biblediscoveries.com/content/view/17/34/
Originally posted by Proper KnobI don't know if these are the other questions you say I'm not responding to or not. If not let me know.
Sorry, my mistake i forgot you weren't a Young Earth Creationist.
The speeds at which the plate tectonics move have been mapped and are well known. But let's just say your theory is true, i have two problems with it.
1. How is water going to suddenly thrust a colossal piece of the earths crust up to 8km up into the air. Do you have any idea what ...[text shortened]... d to be would be new, in your case 4,000yrs old as that is when you believe this all happened.
In responce to the tsunami in Japan not moving the earths crust your thinking really small. I'm not talking about 20-40 feet of water here, I'm talking miles deep. But you are aware the the earthquake involved with Japan did move the earth in spots many feet. Now if you were to have miles deep and trillions of tons of water put pressure on the crust below it and then cause splits and cracks and earthquakes then you would easily have many of those plates move and could easlily move in responce to the waters currents and pressure above it. Also the bible says that the underground springs broke open and let flood gates of water out. So now you would have empty caverns or water tables that would colapse from the weight of the water on the surface and that would cause further movement of earth.
It is also possible that before the flood there were no plates. It's the pressure of the water earth wide that could have caused this cracking and breaking of land masses from the waters tremendous weight. Think really big here.....
Originally posted by galveston75The earth crust moved during the Japanese earthquake because of the earthquake not because of the tsunami, the tsunami was a result of the earthquake.
I don't know if these are the other questions you say I'm not responding to or not. If not let me know.
In responce to the tsunami in Japan not moving the earths crust your thinking really small. I'm not talking about 20-40 feet of water here, I'm talking miles deep. But you are aware the the earthquake involved with Japan did move the earth in spots ...[text shortened]... g and breaking of land masses from the waters tremendous weight. Think really big here.....
So not only are the Himalayas only 4,300yrs old, now the movement of the earths crust didn't start occurring until 4,300yrs ago. Do you have any scientific evidence for this, or is this just something your making up as you go along?!