Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke about dj2beckerYour accepting his apology notwithstanding. you are right about this and I have been here on this forum for over 10 years.
Undoubtedly the most depraved misuse of personal information ever in the history of this site.
-Removed-Wrong. You have repeatedly ridiculed me for being the sole caretaker of my mother, claiming I’m tied to her “apron strings,” and repeatedly minimized what I do for my mother as characterized “looking after” her.
I’ve asked you several times to no longer mention my mother, since you only do it for trolling purposes, and you refuse to stop.
Given what Becker said, I am more aware of the potential motivation for your obsession with my mother and your need to ridicule me for caring for her.
Originally posted by @romans1009I don't think anyone has "trolled" you about your mother and I certainly have not. Yiu used it to illustrate your personal theology and I engaged you on that.
His obsession with ridiculing my relationship with my mother makes much more sense knowing the information you shared and I do indeed see his use of my mother to troll me in a different and more sympathetic light.
As for the "more sympathetic light" you seem to think you are seeing or acting upon now - which is not something clear to see from your reaction to all this -
divegeester, by his own admission, had a happy childhood brought up lovingly by the only mother he remembers.
So where does that leave dj2becker's attempt to use the suicide of divegeester's birth mother as forum banter?
Originally posted by @romans1009 to divegeesterBut haven't you been following? What dj2becker claimed was false.
Given what Becker said, I am more aware of the potential motivation for your obsession with my mother and your need to ridicule me for caring for her.
Originally posted by @fmfI have no interest in discussing this with you. I’ve said all I want to say on the issue.
I don't think anyone has "trolled" you about your mother and I certainly have not. Yiu used it to illustrate your personal theology and I engaged you on that.
As for the "more sympathetic light" you seem to think you are seeing or acting upon now - which is not something clear to see from your reaction to all this -
divegeester, by his own admission, had a ...[text shortened]... that leave dj2becker's attempt to use the suicide of divegeester's birth mother as forum banter?
Originally posted by @romans1009Pretending that dj2becker wasn't "trolling" and that his false "information" about divegeester not having a "happy childhood" has made you "aware" of the alleged "unhappy childhood" is hardly a sign of respect. Do you think it is?
You have made a general request that people not discuss your mother. I will respect that..
Originally posted by @romans1009You are continuing to post as if dj2becker's "information" was not a lie.
I have no interest in discussing this with you. I’ve said all I want to say on the issue.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerOn page 65 of the Evidence Please thread.
When did I say your childhood was difficult?
Originally posted by @fmfWhy are you continuing to use the death of a poster’s mother as the basis for your trolling?
Pretending that dj2becker wasn't "trolling" and that his false "information" about divegeester not having a "happy childhood" has made you "aware" of the alleged "unhappy childhood" is hardly a sign of respect. Do you think it is?
Have you no shame?
Is another community-wide apology from you in the offing?
Originally posted by @romans1009It is you and dj2becker who are "trolling" divegeester about the suicide of his birth mother, not me. It's one of the worst things I have seen on this forum.
And you continue to exploit the death of a poster’s mother to troll a debate opponent.
You’re a sick guy, FMF.
Originally posted by @romans1009dj2becker deliberately fed you false information. About a suicide of a parent. For the purposes of forum banter.
Why are you continuing to use the death of a poster’s mother as the basis for your trolling?