Originally posted by dj2becker Have you ever seen the wind? But somehow you believe that the wind exists...
Oh, bloody hell! Really?
dj2, would you mind telling me how old you are?
TheSkipper
EDIT: Ah, I see from your profile you are 19. Seeing as you are still quite young and are blessed with an amazing capacity to suck up knowledge would you be willing to read some books I suggest to you with an open mind?
Originally posted by dj2becker Have you ever seen the wind? But somehow you believe that the wind exists...
Your poetic rhetoric would have been effective in the pre-industrial era, when the means to "see" the wind did not exist. Even so, sight doesn't necessarily outrank touch.
Originally posted by Bosse de Nage Your poetic rhetoric would have been effective in the pre-industrial era, when the means to "see" the wind did not exist. Even so, sight doesn't necessarily outrank touch.
I'm sure you can do better than that.
Unfortunately, this is neither the first time he has used this analogy, nor in fact the worst of them.
Originally posted by LemonJello the point, dj2, is that your analogies here are really sucky: you are referring to natural things and trying to generalize to supernatural things.
that is why no one is giving you the time of day in this thread.
Is an electron a natural thing? Which of its physical qualities makes it natural?