28 Jul 10
2 edits
"Forbidden Archeology" is the book that turned the scientific community upside-down, and finally put the last nail in the coffin of the debunkt Evolution Therory.
The evolution therory has been debunkt for a long time, but the puffed up pseudo scientists are clinging to this therory still, because to admit its failings is too painfull and embarrassing, so they try to keep the lie alive by stupifying arguements and blatant disreguard to any evidence to the contrary.
The authors are Richrd L Thompsom and Micheal A. Cremo who are experts in the field of Archeology and Paleoanthropology, travelled the world for 8 years and researched every Acheological finding, and discovered a systematic cover up.
They discovered evidence that man lived on earth millions of years ago, in co-existence with apes and dinosaurs, and this evidence was hidden and excluded from puplic scrutiny.
Why did the evidence go missing and why was it not included in our text books, what are they hiding, and why did so many Archeologists loose their positions for trying to bring the real evidence forward.
Other books by Thompson and Cremo are: The Hidden History of the Human Race and DeEvolution. and Mysteries of The Sacred Universe. and Vedic Cosmology and Astronomy. and Mechanistic and non Mechanistc Science. and Maya the World As Virtual Reality.
(Richard L Thompson Ph D.) in Mathematics./ Probability Therory. / Statistical Mechanics. / Quantim Physics. / Mathematical Biology.
Micheal A. Cremo: worlds most leading authority in Paleoanthropology and Human Antiquity.
Yes, after Forbidden Archeology was published, there was a backlash of complaints, but this is to be exspected, and the people who are doing all the complaining, are the ones who are perpetuating the lie. (they have no credibility)
Its ironic but true, science doesnt support evolution, its against evolution,and honest science shows us that evolution is false.
I believe it is the duty of every honest person to read this book and discover for yourself (the Truth).
Vishva
28 Jul 10
Originally posted by vishvahetuWhy would scientists wish to cover up the history of man?
"Forbidden Archeology" is the book that turned the scientific community upside-down, and finally put the last nail in the coffin of the debunkt Evolution Therory.
The evolution therory has been debunkt for a long time, but the puffed up pseudo scientists are clinging to this therory still, because to admit its failings is too painfull and embarrassing, ...[text shortened]... duty of every honest person to read this book and discover for yourself (the Truth).
Vishva
28 Jul 10
Originally posted by vishvahetuOh, not another one believing that Dinosaurs and Man coexisted...
"Forbidden Archeology" is the book that turned the scientific community upside-down, and finally put the last nail in the coffin of the debunkt Evolution Therory.
The evolution therory has been debunkt for a long time, but the puffed up pseudo scientists are clinging to this therory still, because to admit its failings is too painfull and embarrassing, ...[text shortened]... duty of every honest person to read this book and discover for yourself (the Truth).
Vishva
And furthermore takes it as a 'proof' that evolution is wrong...
Why not try to learn something about science and evolution to begin with...
28 Jul 10
Originally posted by FabianFnasHere's your proof that dinosaurs and man coexisted:
Oh, not another one believing that Dinosaurs and Man coexisted...
And furthermore takes it as a 'proof' that evolution is wrong...
Why not try to learn something about science and evolution to begin with...
&feature=related
Next time do a little research.
28 Jul 10
Originally posted by vishvahetuIn fact this book is the same kind of pseudo-science that Eric Von Daniken is 'famous' for. As far as I am aware the only hard evidence they present (most of the 'specimens' they refer to unfortunately 'no longer exist'😉 is that for the ancient 'steel' spheres (http://www.worldlingo.com/ma/enwiki/en/Klerksdorp_Spheres).
"Forbidden Archeology" is the book that turned the scientific community upside-down, and finally put the last nail in the coffin of the debunkt Evolution Therory.
The evolution therory has been debunkt for a long time, but the puffed up pseudo scientists are clinging to this therory still, because to admit its failings is too painfull and embarrassing, ...[text shortened]... duty of every honest person to read this book and discover for yourself (the Truth).
Vishva
Thompson is a mathematician. Cremo is in no way the 'worlds most leading authority in Palaeoanthropology and Human Antiquity', well, apart from in you far-from-humble opinion. In fact, even allowing the two years he spent at Washington University in the late sixties, he appears to be completely lacking in academic qualifications and experience in the fields in which he chooses to publish.
Credible stuff.
29 Jul 10
1 edit
Originally posted by vishvahetuSo we have a book on archaeology written by a mathematician, and someone who has no education worth mentioning.
(Richard L Thompson Ph D.) in Mathematics./ Probability Therory. / Statistical Mechanics. / Quantim Physics. / Mathematical Biology.
Micheal A. Cremo: worlds most leading authority in Paleoanthropology and Human Antiquity.
What is a 'most leading authority'?
Usually the term 'authority' refers to someone that others respect. In this case, that clearly isn't true, in fact, it is one of the claims of the books that they are totally lacking in authority.
29 Jul 10
Originally posted by avalanchethecatSo you are saying, from your experience, that there is no credible evidence that humans and dinosoars co-habitated the Earth? (It would make sense from the point of view that the dino's were wiped out, so the humans would've been wiped out too if they lived together.)
In fact this book is the same kind of pseudo-science that Eric Von Daniken is 'famous' for. As far as I am aware the only hard evidence they present (most of the 'specimens' they refer to unfortunately 'no longer exist'😉 is that for the ancient 'steel' spheres (http://www.worldlingo.com/ma/enwiki/en/Klerksdorp_Spheres).
Thompson is a mathematic ...[text shortened]... ations and experience in the fields in which he chooses to publish.
Credible stuff.
Is it possible that humans have been around for 100 000yrs? 200 000?
Whats your opinion on how long humans have been on this planet?
29 Jul 10
Originally posted by avalanchethecatVon Daniken, L.Ron Hubbard and the like have given much fuel to the skeptics.
In fact this book is the same kind of pseudo-science that Eric Von Daniken is 'famous' for. As far as I am aware the only hard evidence they present (most of the 'specimens' they refer to unfortunately 'no longer exist'😉 is that for the ancient 'steel' spheres (http://www.worldlingo.com/ma/enwiki/en/Klerksdorp_Spheres).
Thompson is a mathematic ...[text shortened]... ations and experience in the fields in which he chooses to publish.
Credible stuff.
They take a piece of truth and distort it until it suits their egos. I guess a lot of people do that, but when you are dealing with such serious, reality-shaping issues, you really need to study properly, and always re-check all the facts and make sure they fit with other facts. Thats what I try to do.
In my study of ufo-lore I have come across many duds. Also I have come across much channelled information that makes claims about humans early history.
I have spent some years now sifting through these claims , for I know that there has to be one true history of the planet.
Similarly, I believe that the bible is also a good reference point for historical claims.
One more question: Do you believe there are any cover-ups and/or unwarranted discreditting when it comes to ANY areas of science?
29 Jul 10
Originally posted by karoly aczelSeriously? Apart from the story of Eden and the flood, the Bible makes no claims about history older than about 3000 years ago.
Similarly, I believe that the bible is also a good reference point for historical claims.
It certainly won't tell you anything useful about 200,000 years ago, or even further back when dinosaurs existed.
29 Jul 10
Originally posted by karoly aczelThere is no evidence humans lived with dinosaurs. The dinosaurs died out about 65million years ago, with an asteroid smashing into the earth being the most likely cause.
So you are saying, from your experience, that there is no credible evidence that humans and dinosoars co-habitated the Earth? (It would make sense from the point of view that the dino's were wiped out, so the humans would've been wiped out too if they lived together.)
Is it possible that humans have been around for 100 000yrs? 200 000?
Whats your opinion on how long humans have been on this planet?
mtDNA and Y-Chromosone analysis puts our species at about 150,000 - 200,000yrs old, originating in Africa. We were hunter gatherers until 10,000yrs ago or so until we started living in permenant settled communities.
This belief that we could have been here for billions of years is utter nonsense. There wasn't enough oxygen in the atmosphere for us to breath, you'd die rather quickly.
29 Jul 10
Originally posted by twhiteheadOh no, I meant the bible was good for cross-refrencing other claims(from upto 3000 years ago,like you say).
Seriously? Apart from the story of Eden and the flood, the Bible makes no claims about history older than about 3000 years ago.
It certainly won't tell you anything useful about 200,000 years ago, or even further back when dinosaurs existed.
After all there must be some truth in the bible otherwise I dont think so many people would follow it.
29 Jul 10
Originally posted by Proper KnobSo the people that lived 150 000-200 000 years ago, would they have be like us or neaderathals? Do you think there was a missing link in the physical evolution of humans? (By "missing link", I dont necessarily mean the same missing link to the fossil records. The missing link could be people becoming rapidly intelligent through ingesting drugs, alien intervention, or maybe some sort of critical point being reached by the mass conciousness.)
There is no evidence humans lived with dinosaurs. The dinosaurs died out about 65million years ago, with an asteroid smashing into the earth being the most likely cause.
mtDNA and Y-Chromosone analysis puts our species at about 150,000 - 200,000yrs old, originating in Africa. We were hunter gatherers until 10,000yrs ago or so until we started living ...[text shortened]... ense. There wasn't enough oxygen in the atmosphere for us to breath, you'd die rather quickly.
Do you think all people evolved at the same rate, or do you think there were pockets of societies that were CONSIDERABLY more advanced than other societies of the same time ?
29 Jul 10
Originally posted by karoly aczelThey were anatomically like us. I would expect that cognitively they were the same as us also.
So the people that lived 150 000-200 000 years ago, would they have be like us or neaderathals? Do you think there was a missing link in the physical evolution of humans? (By "missing link", I dont necessarily mean the same missing link to the fossil records. The missing link could be people becoming rapidly intelligent through ingesting drugs, alien in ...[text shortened]... kets of societies that were CONSIDERABLY more advanced than other societies of the same time ?
I don't think there is a physical missing link.
Do you mean settled civilisations? If you do we've only been doing that for 10,000yrs. It took civilisation 1300yrs or so to catch up with what the Romans managed to achieve. They were considerably more advanced than most of the populations in Europe at that time.