Frogstomp's insults thread

OK. Give me your best shot...

Originally posted by dj2becker
OK. Give me your best shot...

For one thing, froggy says we're not Christians. We're Paulinists.

Originally posted by lucifershammer
For one thing, froggy says we're not Christians. We're Paulinists.

I wonder how, where and when he got that idea...

Originally posted by dj2becker
I wonder how, where and when he got that idea...

Do you understand his perspective on Paul?

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Do you understand his perspective on Paul?

Yes, and I do understand his perspective on the Bible as well.

Originally posted by dj2becker
Yes, and I do understand his perspective on the Bible as well.

Super.

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Super.

This thread is becoming dull!

I was about to try and outline froggy's thesis on the Pauline influence on Christianity, but I realised I've only got a vague idea of his views. I know he thinks that it was Paul who made faith an important element of Christian faith (Jesus was more of a good works person). I also know he thinks that the Early Church suppressed the Gnostics in a power struggle (he disapproves very strongly of Iraneus, for instance).

But, beyond that, I know little else. Could someone fill in the gaps?

Originally posted by lucifershammer
This thread is becoming dull!

I was about to try and outline froggy's thesis on the Pauline influence on Christianity, but I realised I've only got a vague idea of his views. I know he thinks that it was Paul who made faith an important element of Christian faith (Jesus was more of a good works person). I also know he thinks that the Early Church ...[text shortened]... eus, for instance).

But, beyond that, I know little else. Could someone fill in the gaps?

Well that about as much as I know.

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Super.

Are you frogstomps prophet? 😉

If so would you mind filling in the gaps?

Originally posted by dj2becker
Are you frogstomps prophet? 😉

If so would you mind filling in the gaps?

As far as I know Frogstomp hasn't declared himself God.

You said you understood his views and then admitted a couple of posts later that you haven't really a clue of what he's on about.

To keep it simple, Paul came up with a theory that had practically nothing to do with what Christ said.

Here's a page on Pauline theology: http://www.abu.nb.ca/courses/NTIntro/Spirit7.htm

You can do your own research, though, I'm sure.

Luther was one of those who rejected Paul's dogma as irrational.

Have you looked into Gospel of Thomas or any of the other gnostic gospels?

Originally posted by dj2becker
OK. Give me your best shot...

Your ancestors were apes.

Originally posted by dj2becker
OK. Give me your best shot...

Are your maladjusted anti-social tendencies product of your berserk pituitary gland? 😀

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Your ancestors were apes.

The Nebraskan man proves this! 😀

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
As far as I know Frogstomp hasn't declared himself God.

You said you understood his views and then admitted a couple of posts later that you haven't really a clue of what he's on about.

To keep it simple, Paul came up with a theory that had practically nothing to do with what Christ said.

Here's a page on Pauline theology: http://www.ab ...[text shortened]... a as irrational.

Have you looked into Gospel of Thomas or any of the other gnostic gospels?

To keep it simple, Paul came up with a theory that had practically nothing to do with what Christ said.

Would you like to supply something from the Bible to support this statement?

Originally posted by dj2becker
[b]To keep it simple, Paul came up with a theory that had practically nothing to do with what Christ said.

Would you like to supply something from the Bible to support this statement?
[/b]

Why don't you do your own research?

Plenty of bible quotes in this article:

http://www.comparative-religion.com/articles/pauline_conspiracy/pauline_conspiracy13.php