16 Jan '20 23:10>1 edit
@rookie54 saidIn this case it created the argument.
interesting how a translation can mess up an argument
@rookie54 saidIn this case it created the argument.
interesting how a translation can mess up an argument
@divegeester saidI guess you disagree with the facts. The Bible is the most published book by more than double the top ten books written by man in the last five hundred years.
It’s only “bickering” when you’re the one who’s wrong, and you are wrong.
The difference between “preached“ and “published” is probably 1500 years and a printing press to you, you doofus.
@divegeester saidIt's right because that's exactly what happened.
Published is wrong.
@divegeester saidYou created the argument. And you're arguing against reality.
In this case it created the argument.
@secondson saidIt is the McDonalds of literature: bland.
The gospel of Jesus Christ has been preached and published more that anything else on the planet, and to more people.
@secondson saidGod is not joking .
Approximately 2 billion of the top 10 books written by man have been published in the last 500 years, but the Bible, all by itself, has been published nearly 5 billion times, and their are close to 4 billion in circulation today.
In the 13th chapter of Mark Jesus gives the outline of events that will transpire in the near and far.
Verse two refers to the destruction o ...[text shortened]... ng all nations.
Jesus is near. Wake up!
Mark 13:36
Lest coming suddenly he find you sleeping.
@secondson saidMark 13:10 is correctly and more frequently translated as “preached” which makes far more sense considering that the “publishing” of books as a concept didn’t even exist when the words were written.
I guess you disagree with the facts. The Bible is the most published book by more than double the top ten books written by man in the last five hundred years.
But you bicker over a single word like a frustrated bitch.
@secondson saidThis is a debate forum and I’m debating you Joseph.
It's right because that's exactly what happened.
But keep bickering because that's what you're good at.
@secondson saidI’m calling out your intellectual dishonesty whereby you are misrepresenting biblical scripture in order to make a weak and ineffectual point on an Internet forum board.
You created the argument. And you're arguing against reality.
@caissad4 saidI guess I'll find coal in my stocking.
God is not joking .
Well neither is Santa Claus .
And he is coming to town .
And he knows if you have been bad or good .
@divegeester saidI said "frustrated bitch" not "frustrated little bitch". I would never say you were little.
Mark 13:10 is correctly and more frequently translated as “preached” which makes far more sense considering that the “publishing” of books as a concept didn’t even exist when the words were written.
What you are doing is misrepresenting scripture in order to score points on the internet and me calling you out for it is not me being a “frustrated little bitch” even if you saying that gives you a little burst of hateful joy.
@secondson saidFrequently when cornered debate with resort to exhibiting a nastiness rarely seen in other people here. Except sonship possibly.
I said "frustrated bitch" not "frustrated little bitch". I would never say you were little.
@secondson saidMark 10:13 is not translated as published it is translated as preached.
Bitch nitpicking is all that is. Ever hear of what scribes do?
@secondson saidYour OP claims that the bible prophesies that the word of God will be “published” it doesn’t, you are misrepresenting scripture in order to try to make a point.
The scribes were very precise, and made buttloads of copies. It was how God's Word was "published", and copies were expensive.
Nevertheless, there exists today more extant manuscripts of God's Word than for anything else by a far margin.
And the point of my OP still stands, notwithstanding your efforts to bitch nitpick over a word.