Spirituality
07 Mar 18
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @apathist“When you say there’s too much evil in this world you assume there’s good. When you assume there’s good, you assume there’s such a thing as a moral law on the basis of which to differentiate between good and evil. But if you assume a moral law, you must posit a moral Law Giver, but that’s Who you’re trying to disprove and not prove. Because if there’s no moral Law Giver, there’s no moral law. If there’s no moral law, there’s no good. If there’s no good, there’s no evil. What is your question?”
God made everything that exists. Evil exists.So who is to blame for the existence of evil?
—Ravi Zacharias
07 Mar 18
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWhen I don't know, I'd rather go with "I don't know". Maybe we were made on purpose, but if things that exist MUST have been made on purpose, we just started stacking turtles.
I'm guessing you would rather go with 'nothing' made everything?
07 Mar 18
Originally posted by @dj2beckerOkay.
“When you say there’s too much evil in this world you assume there’s good. When you assume there’s good, you assume there’s such a thing as a moral law on the basis of which to differentiate between good and evil. But if you assume a moral law, you must posit a moral Law Giver, ...
—Ravi Zacharias[/b]
...but that’s Who you’re trying to disprove and not prove. Because if there’s no moral Law Giver, there’s no moral law. If there’s no moral law, there’s no good. If there’s no good, there’s no evil. What is your question?
I asked if God made everything and evil exists then who is responsible for the existence of evil.
I'm not attempting to prove there are no gods. Maybe I'm checking to see if bible-lovers are afraid to answer direct honest questions.
07 Mar 18
Originally posted by @apathistThe word "evil" refers to certain kinds of morally unsound behaviour. It is a human (i.e. mundane) social construct, not a supernatural one, even if many humans do superimpose such notions onto the concept in their efforts to make sense of the human condition.
God made everything that exists. Evil exists.So who is to blame for the existence of evil?
I would suggest that "evil" is egregious immorality (as already defined in other discussions) and gratuitous, sociopathic action that is gravely detrimental and/or damaging to others, and which stems from an abject lack or even absence of empathy and compassion.
To avoid confusion, it's probably best used as an adjective rather than a noun. It's not a 'thing' that exists or that was instituted by an evil being.
The word "evil" is simply an adjective that is more loaded up with disapproval than the word "bad".
07 Mar 18
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWe can't tell right from wrong unless we are told? We are all told all kinds of stuff. So we have to make decisions.
“When you say there’s too much evil in this world you assume there’s good. When you assume there’s good, you assume there’s such a thing as a moral law on the basis of which to differentiate between good and evil. But if you assume a moral law, you must posit a moral Law Giver, ..."
Why did I not just figure out where our moral laws come from?
07 Mar 18
Originally posted by @apathistI disagree. While I'd say taking enjoyment from the suffering of others could well be evil in some cases, I don't think there has to be an element of taking enjoyment from the suffering of others in order for behaviour to be evil.
I'd add more and say evil is taking enjoyment from the suffuring of others. Schadenfreude.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
07 Mar 18
Originally posted by @apathistOr perhaps the universe and everything in it has 'always' existed (in one form or another). There was no 'creation,' no beginning (as finite humans understand it) no (one off) 'Big Bang.'
God made everything that exists. Evil exists.So who is to blame for the existence of evil?
This being the case (as is believed by millions of people around the Earth) God created neither good or evil. They have always existed. (In one form or another).
- Joined
- 29 Dec 08
- Moves
- 6788
07 Mar 18
Originally posted by @dj2beckerIf made implies maker, I'd rather go with "everything wasn't made", in an argument for the existence of a maker, to avoid the fallacy of begging the question (petitio principii).
I'm guessing you would rather go with 'nothing' made everything?
07 Mar 18
Originally posted by @fmfI know you say evil is just an upper level of bad. One of the most horrible thing I'm aware of is that some creatures paralyze their prey and plant eggs in them. The eggs get a living host to feed on as they grow up. Are these parasites evil?
I disagree. While I'd say taking enjoyment from the suffering of others could well be evil in some cases, I don't think there has to be an element of taking enjoyment from the suffering of others in order for behaviour to be evil.
07 Mar 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeThis philosophical question is the most difficult I know of. Either the universe existed forever, or it had a beginning. Neither answer works, and I've never heard of another answer.
Or perhaps the universe and everything in it has 'always' existed (in one form or another). There was no 'creation,' no beginning (as finite humans understand it) no (one off) 'Big Bang.'
...