Originally posted by checkbaiter
God is omniscient and He did forsee evil....I'm not certain what you mean by omnibenevolent ...allowing evil to occur for a purpose does not make God evil....maybe allowing is not the right word.....God cannot go against Himself...Adam transferred all power and authority to satan, through deception in the garden. God cannot legally just take it back. He ...[text shortened]... s not some might say.."an indian giver" He cannot promise you something and then take it away.
God forsaw that evil would occur. He had the power to prevent it from happening but did not.
God created Adam (so the story goes). God knew even before then that Adam would sin. God could have created Adam differently so that he wouldn't sin, or could have intervened to thwart Satan from tempting Adam. But god allowed all these events to transpire with the full knowledge that they would result in evil (it's not physically possible to deceive an omniscient god). The inescapable conclusion is that god wanted these events to transpire exactly as they did. God wanted evil in this world.
Omnibenevolent means all-loving. That should have been clear from my previous post. An all-loving god would not want evil to occur, or would not allow its continuance if there was a means to acheiving his goal which could have been accomplished without resorting to the use of evil. If god is all-powerful, he should have been able to create a world that functions in any number of ways. To say that he could not come up with a solution to the problem that did not rely on the use of evil is to say that he is not omnipotent.
If god either causes or allows evil to occur, then he is not omnibenevolent (all-loving).
If god cannot prevent evil from occuring then he is not omnipotent (all-powerful).
If god did not forsee the occurance of evil, or that Adam would sin, then he is not omniscient (all-knowing).
It is not possible to reconcile the presence of evil in the world with an all-loving, all-powerful, and all-knowing god. You can only have two out of three. The conclusion is that the christian god is a logical contradiction that cannot exist, or that god must lack at least one of the three traits traditionally attributed to him, which means he really isn't much of a god.