@eladar saidNo. Why would you think I would agree with that?
So you agree that God created marriage when he created Adam and Eve?
I've said it before but I think it bears repeating, the religion you profess to follow is named after Jesus. You don't seem very much inclined to consider His teachings; did it ever occur to you that maybe Christianity and you are just not a great fit?
@avalanchethecat saidWhy? Because this was a teaching from Jesus.
No. Why would you think I would agree with that?
I've said it before but I think it bears repeating, the religion you profess to follow is named after Jesus. You don't seem very much inclined to consider His teachings; did it ever occur to you that maybe Christianity and you are just not a great fit?
@avalanchethecat saidHe mentioned it directly.
Well, not really. Sure He rubber-stamped it, but it's not a part of the message which spawned the faith named for Him.. You keep getting hung up on these diverting details without really grasping that.
@eladar saidHere is more hate
He mentioned it directly.
From Matthew 19
Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh. So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”
@eladar saidAnd that's the core message you took from your reading of the Gospels?
Here is more hate
From Matthew 19
Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh. So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”
@avalanchethecat saidYou said Jesus' teachings.
And that's the core message you took from your reading of the Gospels?
@avalanchethecat saidThe problem is you do not know all of Jesus' teachings, so you simply embrace the ones you embrace and ignore others, then claim to accept what Jesus taught.
🤔
@avalanchethecat saidGlad to be here so that I can clear up your ignorance.
Right, THAT's what the problem is. 🙄
@ghost-of-a-duke saidJust in case you missed my response.
Perhaps you need to revisit Romans 13:8-10 and really take it to heart:
'Owe no one anything, except to love each other, for the one who loves another has fulfilled the law. For the commandments, “You shall not commit adultery, You shall not murder, You shall not steal, You shall not covet,” and any other commandment, are summed up in this word: “You shall love you ...[text shortened]... ighbor as yourself.” Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.'
So you agree then that thieves do not have the Law written on their hearts.
@avalanchethecat saidI am educating you on Jesus' teachings and what Jesus believed, not what I believe.
Well, insofar as I still can't see how somebody who calls themselves a Christian can cheerfully advocate the wholesale murder of innocents, I don't think you have.
By the way Jesus calls God, who ordered the genocide, good. This implied Jesus believed the genocide was good. I am not sure if you are going to accept this because it is the truth according to the Bible.
@eladar saidI've told you at least twice that the Bible says the law is written on everyone's heart but that individuals don't have to act (being autonomous individuals) according to their conscience, such as the thief. Romans warns of the consequences of this.
Just in case you missed my response.
So you agree then that thieves do not have the Law written on their hearts.
Will you be asking this question again?