Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
I used no "deceptive tactics". You've twisted things in order to make a point as you've done several times during this discussion of which I've documented but a few.
Once again:
When you've calmed down, try to be objective and read through our discussion. If you really put in an effort to comprehend what is being said, maybe you'll be able to ...[text shortened]... ngs in order to make a point. Seriously. I think it might do you a world of good.
Regardless how you poster yourself as the more civil and more reasonable, those of us who have dealt with you know you ThinkOfOne.
If you think you can throw dirt and then innocently smile that you want civility, it won't work. Points which you CANNOT refute you dismiss as irrelevant and red herrings.
You tried hard to draw a wedge between the teachings of Jesus (your view of His words MINUS John, Minus Acts, Minus Revelation) and the epistles of Paul.
Without question, I proved to you that there were plenty of sober exhortations in Paul's letters making the charge of "Cheap Salvation" so to speak IMPOSSIBLE to level at Paul.
I don't recall you dealing with any of those passages. I recall you glossing over them, ignoring them. I would have had more respect for you had you simply admitted that those passages from Paul indeed did not support your concept of Paul.
You are again dusting off the old argument and trying it again. "
Jesus, you like.
Paul messed up the teachings of Jesus."
I suspect that others who have come to this forum since Ephinahas and I (possibly Freaky too) previously dealt with your tactics will see through them as we did.