Gratification

@fmf said
You never contacted me about the use of a pseudonym.

Correct. Because you had ignored my two previous attempts to message you, one by email and once by PM on this site.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
In the last exchange I asked why you had delete it (the PM) without replying to it. I simply don't believe you don't remember this.

Because it is a new fabrication that you have wheeled out after 3.5 years.

@fmf said
I dug out the emails last week. I haven't deleted any messages.

There was only 1 email that you ignored. The second was a PM you deleted without replying to. Something I have referenced many times over the years.


Why would I contact you a 3rd time?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Correct. Because you had ignored my two previous attempts to message you, one by email and once by PM on this site.

You never contacted me about the use of a pseudonym. Instead you took the most malicious action you could think of.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
There was only 1 email that you ignored. The second was a PM you deleted without replying to.

You are lying.

@fmf said
Because it is a new fabrication that you have wheeled out after 3.5 years.

That simply isn't true. Your denial is weird because it is something I have referenced on a number of occasions.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
There was only 1 email that you ignored. The second was a PM you deleted without replying to. Something I have referenced many times over the years.


Why would I contact you a 3rd time?

You have never mentioned "a PM [I] deleted without replying to" before. Not once in 3+ yearsm

@fmf said
You are lying.

If I locate an example tomorrow will you publicly apologise?

I can get the timelines.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
That simply isn't true. Your denial is weird because it is something I have referenced on a number of occasions.

Why don't you swear on the lives of all the baby seals, then?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
If I locate an example tomorrow will you publicly apologise?

I can get the timelines.

Timelines? What nonsense is this now?

@fmf said
You have never mentioned "a PM [I] deleted without replying to" before. Not once in 3+ yearsm

Simply not true. The last time we discussed it was not too long ago. You said you often deleted PMs and that there couldn't have been anything in my PM you needed to respond to. You really don't remember that?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Simply not true. The last time we discussed it was not too long ago. You said you often deleted PMs and that there couldn't have been anything in my PM you needed to respond to. You really don't remember that?

You are making this up.

@fmf said
Timelines? What nonsense is this now?

What I mean is I can approximate when a thread discussing this is likely to have occurred. (Based on other threads).

@ghost-of-a-duke said
If I locate an example tomorrow will you publicly apologise?

I can get the timelines.

You said you heard the pseudonym used in show 3 and you contacted the radio station after show 4 having not contacted me about show 3.

@fmf said
You are making this up.

It is too recent for you not to remember.

But anyway. I sent you two messages that you ignored, the second by PM which you deleted without replying to. This is the reason I didn't message you again after the radio thing.