Gratification

@fmf said
@ghost-of-a-duke
If I show the message complaining about the show that you DID send, not to me but to the radio station, to whoever's interested here, would that be a case of backstabbing by me?

Backstabbing occurs between friends. I think we are long past that.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Not once have I said I messaged you 'after' the contentious broadcasts.

Why ever not? You were about to send a poisonous letter to people in the UK that got the show taken off the air. Why didn't you ask me not to broadcast any more of your onions?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Backstabbing occurs between friends. I think we are long past that.

I take that as a no. In which case will you feel vindicated when I share your letter here?

@fmf said
Why ever not? You were about to send a poisonous letter to people in the UK that got the show taken down. Why didn't you ask me not to broadcast any more of your onions?

Seriously, have we just wasted an hour of our lives because you got the wrong end of the stick?

For the last time, you had ignored my last 2 messages. (leading up to the contentious broadcasts). Why on Earth would I message you again afterwards or have any belief you would respond?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I simply wanted no more of my stories to be included on the show.

Why didn't you tell me?

@fmf said
Why didn't you tell me?

If you responded to messages, I no doubt would have done.

@fmf said
Why didn't you tell me?

Are you just going to ignore this:

"For the last time, you had ignored my last 2 messages. (leading up to the contentious broadcasts). Why on Earth would I message you again afterwards or have any belief you would respond?"

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Seriously, have we just wasted an hour of our lives because you got the wrong end of the stick?

No. You have been furiously trying to obfuscate the fact that, back then, you acquitted yourself in a malicious and creepy way. You sent toxic accusations to a real life radio station without warning me because you were bent out of shape because of something I said about Suzianne in private.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Why on Earth would I message you again afterwards or have any belief you would respond?

Because you were on the verge of doing something very vindictive and damging in retaliation for something you'd said nothing about.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
If you responded to messages, I no doubt would have done.

This is no excuse for what you did and for what you wrote in the letter.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Are you just going to ignore this:

"For the last time, you had ignored my last 2 messages. (leading up to the contentious broadcasts). Why on Earth would I message you again afterwards or have any belief you would respond?"

I haven't ignored it.

@fmf said
This is no excuse for what you did and for what you wrote in the letter.

@ghost-of-a-duke
The excuse for what I did was that I wanted to squeeze a second one of your onions into the show. Your family was surely chuffed to hear two of your onions and not just one.

-Removed-

Hello to you 2.

The point must be too small to avoid, like an ant on a sidewalk, not noticing the insect being there you step on it, inadvertently.

Really, I don't see the point I'm avoiding. Can you point it out?

@pettytalk said
Hello to you 2.

The point must be too small to avoid, like an ant on a sidewalk, not noticing the insect being there you step on it, inadvertently.

Really, I don't see the point I'm avoiding. Can you point it out?

It was pointed out to him in the thread 'Is being an agnostic playing it safe?'

He simply misread one of your earlier posts and seems to have realised this.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Those tepid threats of divine retribution don't work on atheists. You might as well threaten me with leprechauns.

@mchill

Run out of leprechauns?