25 Jun 06
Originally posted by FreakyKBHIn the light of new evidence scientists revise their ideas (shock).
As further testament to the unerring rightness of science, what a great week for those who hold unswervingly to limited understanding.
Introducing Nix and Hydra, two of (at least) three moons in Pluto's orbit--- previously held to be but one. Who says science can't be trusted?
Compare and contrast
In the light of new evidence creationists cling to their (god-dunnit) ideas (shock).
In the light of carefully selected evidence IDers attempt to discredit other people's ideas thus 'proving' that an unknown force(TM)* dunnit.(shock).
* any resemblence between 'unknown force(TM)' and god is entirely coincidental
25 Jun 06
Originally posted by FreakyKBHWell, that is kind of like saying "We have drugs to cure certain diseases now that were thought to be incurable so there's proof that science can't be trusted."
As further testament to the unerring rightness of science, what a great week for those who hold unswervingly to limited understanding.
Introducing Nix and Hydra, two of (at least) three moons in Pluto's orbit--- previously held to be but one. Who says science can't be trusted?
25 Jun 06
Originally posted by FreakyKBHWell I certainly won't be getting on another aeroplane.
As further testament to the unerring rightness of science, what a great week for those who hold unswervingly to limited understanding.
Introducing Nix and Hydra, two of (at least) three moons in Pluto's orbit--- previously held to be but one. Who says science can't be trusted?
25 Jun 06
Originally posted by FreakyKBHI am so thankful that through faith and prayer we came know of the existence of these two satellites.
As further testament to the unerring rightness of science, what a great week for those who hold unswervingly to limited understanding.
Introducing Nix and Hydra, two of (at least) three moons in Pluto's orbit--- previously held to be but one. Who says science can't be trusted?
25 Jun 06
Originally posted by FreakyKBHIt has been revealed to me that these three moons are, in fact, one-- in virtue of their ontological cosubstantiality. Hence, there is no need to worry about heretical incompatibility with previous scientific doctrine.
As further testament to the unerring rightness of science, what a great week for those who hold unswervingly to limited understanding.
Introducing Nix and Hydra, two of (at least) three moons in Pluto's orbit--- previously held to be but one. Who says science can't be trusted?
25 Jun 06
Originally posted by XanthosNZI think you're confusing aeroplanes with bumble bees. Although we now thing that flies actually create a mini vaccuum above their wings that literally "sucks" them upwards.
Did you know that no one knows why planes stay in the air? It's a complete mystery to those damn scientists. 🙄
25 Jun 06
Originally posted by FreakyKBHThis is just such a wonderful example of how much Freaky hates science.
As further testament to the unerring rightness of science, what a great week for those who hold unswervingly to limited understanding.
Introducing Nix and Hydra, two of (at least) three moons in Pluto's orbit--- previously held to be but one. Who says science can't be trusted?
The only question that remains is "why?"