11 Nov '08 01:58>
Originally posted by robbie carrobielol, so you must resort to worldly theologians and the words of lexicographers to establish your credentials...
lol, so you must resort to worldly theologians and the words of lexicographers to establish your credentials, well we have had the apocrypha, so I suppose anything is possible. your argument seems to stem from the quotation of an individual who states that there is no basis for understanding of a word from an etymological basis, naturally as the mea ...[text shortened]... unrepentant complete separation from god with no resurrection prospects, 'the second death'.
It's called research. If you want to be taken seriously, then you should consider citing at least a few legitimate sources of your own.
Furthermore, by citing scholarly publications I'm not attempting to establish my credentials, rather the credibility of the argument I'm presenting. If you think I'm engaged in this debate with you for the sake of one-upmanship, you are sorely mistaken.
...naturally as the meanings of words change, this of course is a fallacy in itself as many words do maintain their etymological value...
True enough, many words do maintain their etymological value, but not all; certainly not in the case of kolasis, a historical fact which the sources I've cited testify to.
Now would be a good time to provide some kind of scholarly material in order to refute the materials which I've provided. Otherwise your argument lacks a basis, and therefore does not deserve serious consideration.
...even if it does mean punishment, it is the nature of the punishment that we are interested in, while you state that it means eternal punishment in a mythical burning...
The nature of the punishment is described in Matthew 25:41: "Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels."
Revelation gives more information on this future condition of the devil. The beast and the false prophet will be "thrown alive into the lake of fire which burns with brimstone" (19:20). Then the devil will be cast into the same lake (20:10), and they "will be tormented day and night forever and ever" (v. 10). Then verse 15 states that "if anyone's name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire." While these verses only say explicitly that the devil, the beast, and the false prophet will be tormented forever and ever, no statement suggests that the persons whose names are not written in the book of life have any different fate in the lake of fire. This supports the view that the punishment spoken of in Matthew 25:41, 46 is also everlasting in nature.
In fact, earlier in Revelation there is an account of human beings who are explicitly condemned to eternal torment. Revelation 14:9-11 reads, "If anyone worships the beast and its image and receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand, he also will drink the wine of God’s wrath, poured full strength into the cup of his anger, and he will be tormented with fire and sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever, and they have no rest, day or night."
This passage, Revelation 14:9-11, at least establishes the fact that eternal torment for an individual soul exists, and annihilates (so to speak) the argument that God would not permit such a punishment to be so.