Originally posted by LemonJello"the fact the organism in question is descriptively classifiable as human bears little, if any, relevance per se"So I'll take that as a vote for the birth fairy
You would. Because that's just basically how you roll in these discussions. Let's not pretend that you initiate any of these threads with the actual intention of discussing anything in any intellectually honest or genuine manner. That of course would require, minimally, that you actually ...[text shortened]... cities; and of course, it depends also on the nature of the circumstances, which can be complex.
Well thanks for that. So you deem some human organisms superior to others. Great to hear that.
Are their other human organisms other than the unborn you think can be killed because they are inferior to you?
Originally posted by whodeyPlease show where Clinton claimed that people like Sonhouse (he said "Obviously you have to limit the time, 1st trimester is the usual case." ) have to be indoctrinated to change their views, or admit that once again you've been distorting the truth to fuel your own hate.
Hillary said that those of faith will simply have to change their views on abortion.
Originally posted by Great King RatIt is sonhouse that is always whining that he wants freedom from religion. 😏
Please show where Clinton claimed that people like Sonhouse (he said "Obviously you have to limit the time, 1st trimester is the usual case." ) have to be indoctrinated to change their views, or admit that once again you've been distorting the truth to fuel your own hate.
Originally posted by whodeyTerrific summary of what I wrote. 🙄
"the fact the organism in question is descriptively classifiable as human bears little, if any, relevance per se"
Well thanks for that. So you deem some human organisms superior to others. Great to hear that.
Are their other human organisms other than the unborn you think can be killed because they are inferior to you?
I would charge you as hard of reading on this point, but we all know better, don't we? Again, that you are so irresponsibly cavalier in your redescribing the views of others speaks to a failure to approach such topics with intellectual integrity, not to mention a failure to show proper respect to your interlocutors.
Originally posted by LemonJello'Interlocutors.' - Nice word. Had to google that one:
...not to mention a failure to show proper respect to your interlocutors.[/b]
1. Someone who takes part in a conversation, often formally or officially.
2. The performer in a minstrel show who is placed midway between the end men and engages in banter with them.