KellyJay asked: How do you define people?
My stab at it:
As a species, we have the capacity for cognition.
As social creatures, our moral compasses have been formed and developed by ~ and for ~ our communal existence.
Each of us has exclusive access to our own unique narrative.
This unique accumulation of memories is seen through the prism of our unique set of moral sensibilities as we interpret past events and experiences, evaluate our interactions, and make decisions in the future.
Because of this, no two people are the same. This is how we each come to have our personhood.
This set of different-for-each-person circumstances - in harness with our set of different-for-each-person proclivities - gives us the definition of what and who each individual person is.
@fmf saidPeople define themselves by what they do.
KellyJay asked: How do you define people?
My stab at it:
As a species, we have the capacity for cognition.
As social creatures, our moral compasses have been formed and developed by ~ and for ~ our communal existence.
Each of us has exclusive access to our own unique narrative.
This unique accumulation of memories is seen through the prism of our unique set of m ...[text shortened]... nt-for-each-person proclivities - gives us the definition of what and who each individual person is.
Not by all their jibber jabbering about who they think they are.
@fmf saidIn the end there are only two types of people.
KellyJay asked: How do you define people?
My stab at it:
As a species, we have the capacity for cognition.
As social creatures, our moral compasses have been formed and developed by ~ and for ~ our communal existence.
Each of us has exclusive access to our own unique narrative.
This unique accumulation of memories is seen through the prism of our unique set of m ...[text shortened]... nt-for-each-person proclivities - gives us the definition of what and who each individual person is.
Those welcomed into the Kingdom of God and all others.
What defines them:
Good v evil
Righteous v Unrighteous
Pleasing to God v Displeasing to God
Who God loves v Who God hates
Sheep v Goats
Chaff to be burned v Fruitful branches
The Good Samaritans v The Priests and Levites
@rajk999 saidBut only according to God's defining.
In the end there are only two types of people.
Those welcomed into the Kingdom of God and all others.
What defines them:
Good v evil
Righteous v Unrighteous
Pleasing to God v Displeasing to God
Who God loves v Who God hates
Sheep v Goats
Chaff to be burned v Fruitful branches
The Good Samaritans v The Priests and Levites
The question of the OP is "how do you define people"?
Not about who gets in the Kingdom.
@josephw saidOk. I tend to define people in similar terms. When I hear of rapists and pedophiles, I call them sick evil criminals. If I see someone giving a poor needy person a plate of food, I know that man is a Good Samaritan.. When there are reports of pastors and priests sexually abusing their congregation I know these are the unrighteous Christians who are just chaff fit to be burned etc etc.
But only according to God's defining.
The question of the OP is "how do you define people"?
Not about who gets in the Kingdom.
@fmf saidThat sounds about right.
KellyJay asked: How do you define people?
My stab at it:
As a species, we have the capacity for cognition.
As social creatures, our moral compasses have been formed and developed by ~ and for ~ our communal existence.
Each of us has exclusive access to our own unique narrative.
This unique accumulation of memories is seen through the prism of our unique set of m ...[text shortened]... nt-for-each-person proclivities - gives us the definition of what and who each individual person is.
@rajk999 saidIt sounds more like you're judging people rather than "defining" them.
Ok. I tend to define people in similar terms. When I hear of rapists and pedophiles, I call them sick evil criminals. If I see someone giving a poor needy person a plate of food, I know that man is a Good Samaritan.. When there are reports of pastors and priests sexually abusing their congregation I know these are the unrighteous Christians who are just chaff fit to be burned etc etc.
Although I agree with your premise of using God's Word as the standard with regards to human conduct.
@divegeester saidYou were cracked up long before you heard of me.
You defined yourself to me as being the “spiritual muscle” in your little backwater church.
Still cracks me up.
And when it comes to "spiritual muscle" I think you're a weakling with nothing better to do than sit around all day whining in this forum with your faithless disregard for the truth of God's Word.
@josephw saidThere is nothing wrong with judging when evil exists. When you see blatant evil you must be able to judge otherwise you are just a robot without understanding, and unable to apply the principles of God. I would rather say using the teachings of Christ as the standard for human conduct is better than using Gods Word [I take it that is the bible]. Mankind has thankfully progressed beyond some of the primitive standards of those early days .
It sounds more like you're judging people rather than "defining" them.
Although I agree with your premise of using God's Word as the standard with regards to human conduct.