@fmf saidBy the way, I felt somehow enriched by your OP.
OK, so be it.
My post only touched on one aspect of humanity--but one that is very apparent in our present world--mankind's control or lack thereof, of anger. Well, that and mankind's bent towards or away from benevolence.
My post, therefore, falls way short of your OP concerning the much broader "definition" of people.
@liljo saidNo, your post is fine. Clearly what I thought we'd be talking about is different from what people - having seen KellyJay's question in the OP - actually want to talk about. It's OK. It's just forum life.
My post, therefore, falls way short of your OP concerning the much broader "definition" of people.
@liljo saidI live in a culture where benevolence is commonplace and anger is [mostly] either avoided or hidden.
My post only touched on one aspect of humanity--but one that is very apparent in our present world--mankind's control or lack thereof, of anger. Well, that and mankind's bent towards or away from benevolence.
1 edit
-Removed-
Gen 1
26 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
27 So God created mankind in his own image,
in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them.