Originally posted by doodinthemood
Evolution is a theory and is thus superior to a fact. Gravity is a theory. Atomic existence is a theory. These are practically the basis for each subject. If one delves further, objects reaching terminal velocity is a fact, genetic throwbacks are facts, ionic bonding is a fact. These are trivial knowledge when compared to theory. Theories are the basis ...[text shortened]... ot understand the mountains of evidence for it, or just plain won't let themselves understand.
Theories are the basis of science, not denying that; however, we do not
always get it right so we call many of these things theories instead of
facts. With regard to evolution, you don't think that people can be
wrong about parts of the things they believe about it, and other parts
of it are correct? I'd say you cannot be serious about that! You'd really
have to define evolution in a very narrow way, the things that is being
giving credit for also comes into play. You can give evolution credit for
X whatever X is and if that is wrong, does that mean that evolution
itself is wrong?
Kelly