Originally posted by jammer and what was "the first gradual step" toward sunlight? or carbon and hydrogen molecules? and what caused the formation of a reduced carbon molecule?
I thought you had all the answers.
and what was "the first gradual step" toward sunlight? or carbon and hydrogen molecules? and what caused the formation of a reduced carbon molecule?
Neither of these questions have anything to do with evolution. However,if you really want to know, ask again, and I'll tell you.
I thought you had all the answers.
Then you have a short memory. I already profused, many times, to not knowing lots of stuff.
Originally posted by scottishinnz Saltation is the "all or nothing" form of evolution, literally man springing forth from a pool of slime fully formed and functional in one easy step. It's so statistically unlikely so as to be a complete non-sense. Evolution is gradual change, one step at a time.
I thought you'd get the joke. 😞 Or realize that what you said was the opposite of what you meant to say.
Originally posted by EcstremeVenom what makes it more credible than creationism if you can not even prove it? there is evidence of creationism also, such as the prophecies that have been fulfilled.
Please supply a list of 'prophesies fulfilled'. Perhaps a new thread would be appropriate so that we can do a thorough job on them
Originally posted by scottishinnz Okay, no individual data point can prove a theory, but one could certainly disprove it.
The thing with evolutionary theory is that it makes sensible predictions that can be tested. For example, a nice one I recently heard. All other apes have 48 chromosomes (24 pairs), except humans who have 46 (23 pairs). Now, if we accept evolution to be true, w ...[text shortened]... e of a perfect chromosome? It doesn't, I'm afraid, make sense. Evolution does, however.
Great post, I never knew that.
Another arguement for evolution against intelligent design is that many things are not intelligently designed. Evolution presents natural reasons for various inefficiencies. However why the bad design flaws? e.g. Our appendix were useful, but not now. Many animals have useless organs, body parts that are throwbacks to their evolutionary pasts.
Originally posted by aardvarkhome Please supply a list of 'prophesies fulfilled'. Perhaps a new thread would be appropriate so that we can do a thorough job on them
humans are similar to apes? :S
29 Apr '07 13:43
Back to Top