12 Feb 06
Originally posted by The Chess ExpressOkay, I must have missed that one originally. I'll deal with it now.
My source is simply common knowledge within the scientific community. See my “An Argument for the Existence of God” Thread now on page two.
[b]ogiginally posted by The Chess Express
Science supports the big bang theory and it supports the theory that matter cannot come from just light and heat. If both of these theories are correct then ...[text shortened]... Keep in mind that “supports” does not mean “proves.”
Thermo dynamics also plays into it.[/b]
Bull.
Light and heat are just diffuse forms of mass. E=mc^2, remember?
Your understanding of science is pre-Enistein, probably stuck somewhere around 1800.
You've got 200 years of catching up. Have fun.
12 Feb 06
Originally posted by scottishinnzMake sure you start with Enistein, though. She's a hoot.
Okay, I must have missed that one originally. I'll deal with it now.
Bull.
Light and heat are just diffuse forms of mass. E=mc^2, remember?
Your understanding of science is pre-Enistein, probably stuck somewhere around 1800.
You've got 200 years of catching up. Have fun.
16 Feb 06
2 edits
Originally posted by scottishinnzOk Scott, since you’re the scientist please explain how light and heat could have produced matter. As far as I know mixing photons with heat does not produce carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorous, or sulfur. Since nearly all the matter in the universe consists of some combination of these six elements how were these produced by the big bang? Have fun explaining it.
Okay, I must have missed that one originally. I'll deal with it now.
Bull.
Light and heat are just diffuse forms of mass. E=mc^2, remember?
Your understanding of science is pre-Enistein, probably stuck somewhere around 1800.
You've got 200 years of catching up. Have fun.