Originally posted by sonhouse
Why do you insist we think our conclusions are flawless? Like the recent flap over what might be faster than light neutrino's, we can go into a lot of wishful thinking we now can make some kind of faster than light propulsion system or some such but the whole flap may be just a case of a bad fiber optic connection. Of course science can be flawed.
Scien ...[text shortened]... you the odd man out in the world, you being the billions of those duped by various religions.
The difference between me and you on science at least those things we have
talked about is I don't call some of the things you believe about the distant
past facts, and I admit I can be wrong about my views about them. You take
that as some kind of slam on all of science which I do, I simply acknowledge our
limitations as I see them. I think as one has claimed here that they are spot
on on the distant dates and ages they are not wrong, now if you think you
cannot be wrong about your views on the past you are no different.
You keep bringing up God to use as a cause for my not accepting your views,
I don't you do! My constant point to you is since you don't know how all of
this got here, you musing over things will no show you how, but it may give
you ideas on what could have happened, there is a difference.
Kelly