03 Jun '14 07:39>
Originally posted by googlefudge😴
Then you would be wrong.
If god is a member of the set of things that exists. Which is what premise 2 states,
which you agree with. Then the phrase 'everything that exists' includes god.
'Everything that exists' is identifying the set of all things that exist.
You believe that god is a member of the set of all things that exist.
Thus 'everything' in the OP includes god.
waiting GB ...