@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidYou seem to be inconsiderate of your fellow transitory sprouts.
You have some gall questioning the validity of an eternal universe while supporting the notion of a young Earth.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidSuch violent language! What is wrong with you?
If you don't like the cut and thrust of social forums, stay out of them.
@Russ : What is wrong with Ghost?
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidI do know that I won't be renewing my RHP subscription, thanks to you and Suzianne, so there's that.
What are you talking about?
Do you even know?
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidI said I can not prove any age, you have issue with that?
You have some gall questioning the validity of an eternal universe while supporting the notion of a young Earth.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidI don’t argue age, you can claim any age what so ever I will not argue because timing not time matters.
All evidence indicates an old Earth. Why have you closed your ears and eyes to this?
@KellyJay saidThe issue I have is that there is overwhelming (conclusive) evidence that the Earth isn't young.
I said I can not prove any age, you have issue with that?
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidAny age can be claimed by any number, the numbers don’t change what is or is not true.
Agreed. The number of adherents to your own faith do not matter.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidGood for you it is meaningless to me.
The issue I have is that there is overwhelming (conclusive) evidence that the Earth isn't young.
@KellyJay saidThe Earth isn't young. Science has shown the Earth to be very old.
Any age can be claimed by any number, the numbers don’t change what is or is not true.
This is a given.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidWell, you got some evidence that cannot mean something other than what you claim it means?
Evidence is meaningless to you?