1. Standard memberOmnislash
    Digital Blasphemy
    Omnipresent
    Joined
    16 Feb '03
    Moves
    21533
    05 Feb '06 08:55
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    What would the religious implications be? It is thought there are
    warm oceans of liquid water under the ice on Europa, the largest
    moon in the solar system, almost as big as mars and is theorized
    to have the conditions under which life could evolve. What would
    that do to world religions, the big three in particular, Judaism,
    Christianity, and Islam.
    Well, I think it would do different things to different organizations of that faith. I think you would see "Huh, well that's interesting", a long, drawn our explanation ladent with reference to religious texts explaining the significance of it and how it relates/predicts in accordance with scripture, as well as an adament refusal to believe the data supplemented with vehement propaganda espousing it as an "anti-theist" conspiracy from the devil. As well as anything and everything in between.

    Depends on the person/organizations perspective and/or desire/need to have their faith explain everything/anything in the universe.

    To this end, I would humbly suggest that it would only have direct meaning if their faith made claims specifically in support of it, or made claims which directly contradict. Otherwise, it would simply be a discovery of interest, which could produce some interesting theological theories. But, like usual, thats just me.....😉
  2. Standard memberjimmyb270
    Top Gun
    Angels 20
    Joined
    27 Aug '03
    Moves
    10670
    07 Feb '06 15:27
    I don't think it would do anything to any faith.
    Remember who would be doing the discovering....that's right, scientists. Anyone who's belief system would be challenged by finding this life would simply claim that the scientists had made mistakes, that the data wasn't accurate....or whatever.
  3. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    07 Feb '06 16:02
    Originally posted by telerion
    I don't know. You're right that we are limited by our ability to conceive other forms of life. If completely different sorts of life were discovered (and we recognized it), scientists of many stripes would be excited as all get out.
    What if these different sorts of life forms were undetectible using the 5 senses? After all, we can only use our 5 senses to have something undergo the scientific process. We all know that there are sounds we cannot hear and rays of light that we cannot see. We only know this because we can build devices to detect them and thus anyalyze them with the 5 senses. Why then would it be a stretch to say that there may be life forms all around us that we cannot detect using the 5 senses or devices to detect them? You may see where I am going with this. When people refer to the spiritual world it is somewhat ironic that they never refer to a spirit as an ET. This is because we are spiritual beings as well. It resonates in us as being "one of us" but without a physical body.
  4. Felicific Forest
    Joined
    15 Dec '02
    Moves
    48721
    07 Feb '06 20:351 edit
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Well personally I would hope it would cause such a furor that it would
    bring all religions down around its knees. I think religions cause
    insanity, especially the higher up in the ranks of the orders you go.
    Like you don't see Pat Robertson picking up a gun and killing
    Peruvian Presidents, he just calls for it to be done, just like Bin Laden.
    Because the devil often presents himself as an angel of light should not entail that we should get rid of the angels of light.
  5. Felicific Forest
    Joined
    15 Dec '02
    Moves
    48721
    07 Feb '06 20:401 edit
    Originally posted by rwingett
    Nothing can phase the hard core religious zealots. But I think it might nudge a few more who are hovering in the middle to cast off their religious superstitions. Each new discovery for science makes one less area for god to ply his wares.
    Rwingo: "Each new discovery for science makes one less area for god to ply his wares."

    You don't understand what true religion is about and you probably never will ..... sorry Rwingo ...
  6. Felicific Forest
    Joined
    15 Dec '02
    Moves
    48721
    07 Feb '06 20:43
    Originally posted by KneverKnight
    I doubt whether a few extra-terrestrial bacteria would faze our religiosi, the discovery of a culture thousands of years more advanced than anything we have here might.
    Oh what am I saying, it's all Satan's doing.
    KK: " .... the discovery of a culture thousands of years more advanced than anything we have here might."

    Advanced in what way ? ... and how would it affect religion ?
  7. Felicific Forest
    Joined
    15 Dec '02
    Moves
    48721
    07 Feb '06 20:51
    Originally posted by whodey
    What if these different sorts of life forms were undetectible using the 5 senses? After all, we can only use our 5 senses to have something undergo the scientific process. We all know that there are sounds we cannot hear and rays of light that we cannot see. We only know this because we can build devices to detect them and thus anyalyze them with the 5 sen ...[text shortened]... piritual beings as well. It resonates in us as being "one of us" but without a physical body.
    Interesting comment. Rec-ed.
  8. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    08 Feb '06 01:531 edit
    Originally posted by ivanhoe
    Rwingo: "Each new discovery for science makes one less area for god to ply his wares."

    You don't understand what true religion is about and you probably never will ..... sorry Rwingo ...
    You also have a serious misunderstanding of what true religion is,
    just the same thing can be said for all the rest of humanity.
    ESPECIALLY the religious. They assume they know what its all about
    and all they can do is read out of a book written by other men and
    try to convince others those books were written by a god but children
    give up their invisible friends by the time they are ten or so, not
    so the religious, they cling to illusion to the day they die with the
    deluded notion everything will be fine now. The only thing
    for sure is they are dead and only remembered in other humans
    memory. The only thing left for the religious is to say, prove there
    is no god, they never say, I will prove there IS a god. You have to
    park your brain in goo and just take its existance on Faith, a great
    thing to have if you feel justified in thinking the rains will come
    next year and make the crops come in but to base the entire
    thrust of a civilization on such notions and then kill other people who
    don't think that way is the opposite of what any true religion should
    be about. Killing is not religious, just another word for power.
  9. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    08 Feb '06 02:43
    Originally posted by whodey
    What if these different sorts of life forms were undetectible using the 5 senses? After all, we can only use our 5 senses to have something undergo the scientific process. We all know that there are sounds we cannot hear and rays of light that we cannot see. We only know this because we can build devices to detect them and thus anyalyze them with the 5 sen ...[text shortened]... piritual beings as well. It resonates in us as being "one of us" but without a physical body.
    Evidence?

    Anyhoo, there are 7 (or 6 depending upon your choice of expert) defining principles of life. If something fulfills all seven properties it is alive. Virus' miss just by a smidgeon. If we came across silicon based complex systems which fulfilled all 7 conditions they would be alive. If we came across manganese based complexity that fulfills all 7 conditions then it is alive. Get the picture? It's pretty easy to spot life, our inability rather, is to explore the universe in a meaningful and complete manner in which to find extraterestrial life.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life
  10. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    08 Feb '06 03:20
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    Evidence?

    Anyhoo, there are 7 (or 6 depending upon your choice of expert) defining principles of life. If something fulfills all seven properties it is alive. Virus' miss just by a smidgeon. If we came across silicon based complex systems which fulfilled all 7 conditions they would be alive. If we came across manganese based complexity that fulfi ...[text shortened]... nd complete manner in which to find extraterestrial life.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life
    Yes this is true as far as it goes but one of the things being discussed
    by scientists these days is the issue of dark matter. Now it seems
    we are getting closer to defining it, if you see the latest results,
    dark matter has had its tempurature taken and it is called 'Tepid'
    in cosmic terms, about 10,000 degrees C somewhat warmer than
    the surface of the sun but a lot colder than its center. Now this is
    of course only speculation but what I think he is talking about here
    may be something like life appearing in dark matter. Dark matter
    hardly interacts with what we think of as the normal universe, the
    two types live independently. So it doesn't take a rocket scientist
    to speculate about what that matter is capable of. For instance, if
    such stuff can organize itself into more complex units of whatever
    the heck it is, then maybe complexity can build on complexity in
    that realm just like ours and lead to dark matter planets,
    dark matter suns, dark matter beings. So if there were such beings,
    as far as we are concerned, they would be as insubstantial as angels
    and could be considered to be one and the same. This dark matter
    stuff is all around us right now but we can't feel them with any
    instrument, unlike neutrino's which we can't feel directly but know
    them through our neutrino detectors which decade by decade get more
    and more detailed information about just what makes neutrino's
    tick. Neutrino's are far more interacting to what we consider ordinary
    matter than dark matter ever will be. Neutrino's are thought to
    cause some form of cancer and some mutations among life forms
    here on earth. There will be no such thing happening with dark
    energy, we run our fingers through the stuff like we run our fingers
    through empty space (if we could do that). We only know about
    dark matter because it has one tie to our kind of matter:
    it produces gravity so it has some kind of mass, we just can't
    detect it directly, only infer its properties by how galaxies
    alter their paths under its influence. So there could be life forms
    in that kind of stuff and we would not be able to detect it directly
    unless there was some way that life form could make stuff like
    light like laser beams or radio waves or gravity waves or even
    neutrino message beams. So it is not an impossible thing to have
    life that would not respond to our senses, even though it satisfies
    all the criteria for life if we could but see it fully.
  11. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    08 Feb '06 04:32
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Yes this is true as far as it goes but one of the things being discussed
    by scientists these days is the issue of dark matter. Now it seems
    we are getting closer to defining it, if you see the latest results,
    dark matter has had its tempurature taken and it is called 'Tepid'
    in cosmic terms, about 10,000 degrees C somewhat warmer than
    the surface of th ...[text shortened]... ses, even though it satisfies
    all the criteria for life if we could but see it fully.
    hmm, yes, I wasn't thinking along that line. It is plausible. However, both Dark matter and Dark energy, whilst tantalising ideas are both just that, ideas. Other plausible ideas also exist, such as our understanding of gravitation not being complete, likewise a huge amount of mass could be accounted for within black holes (again not something that can be optically identified, except when they interact with other things) etc. The truth may even be something stranger, or a mix of any or all the plausible options - we just don't know. I think that whilst black matter life may be theoretically plausible, it is kind of stretching a little (or alot), and has to be pigeon-holed with god in the 'nice idea, but (currently?) untestable' box.
  12. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    08 Feb '06 10:58
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    hmm, yes, I wasn't thinking along that line. It is plausible. However, both Dark matter and Dark energy, whilst tantalising ideas are both just that, ideas. Other plausible ideas also exist, such as our understanding of gravitation not being complete, likewise a huge amount of mass could be accounted for within black holes (again not something that c ...[text shortened]... t), and has to be pigeon-holed with god in the 'nice idea, but (currently?) untestable' box.
    Untestable speculation on my part, thats for sure, but was pointing
    out there could be life we could not detect. Thats not even throwing
    in speculation about other dimensions. I am wondering if this
    dark matter is another dimension semi-intruding on ours anyway.
    Theory has it that gravity is the glue that connects between
    dimensions and there is currently a lot of experiments to test that
    idea, the main thrust being violations of newtons inverse square law
    of gravitational strength. In this case testing that law against smaller
    and smaller separations of mass. Right now they have pretty much
    verified there to be no variation from Newtonian gravity at distances
    of one hundred microns (one tenth of a millimeter) and they are
    pushing to test it at even shorter distances. If at some point they
    find verifiable results in variance with Newton, chances are good it is
    a signal of the interferance of other dimensions, on theory being
    other dimensions are somehow rolled up like some cosmic rug with
    the dimensions of the roll up down towards the planck length but
    whose effects would be felt at much greater distances, maybe
    measured in microns or nanometers, a small distance to be sure
    from our standpoint but huge compared to the size of the rolled up
    dimension. So that work is ongoing so far with no trace of other
    dimensions but they will not stop till they get to nanometer distances
    I am sure. However, the Dark Matter thing is testable and new data
    has shown some of its properites, just released a few days ago, look
    at BBC science or New Scientist. Stuff is getting more testable all the
    time.
  13. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    15 Sep '04
    Moves
    7051
    11 Feb '06 21:41
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    I don't think the origin of life on earth is outside the realm of the
    theory of evolution. That is a separate study. The theory of
    evolution is about what happened after life already started, how
    did it evolve. They don't even TRY to figure out where life came from.
    I don't think the origin of life on earth is outside the realm of the
    theory of evolution.

    No of course it isn't.

    They don't even TRY to figure out where life came from.

    No thats the abiogenetiscists job.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree