1. Donationrwingett
    Ming the Merciless
    Royal Oak, MI
    Joined
    09 Sep '01
    Moves
    27626
    06 Mar '10 12:42
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    I am simply not convinced that your methods would have the effect you think they would. I don't think that is lack of imagination.

    [b]My agenda would be to prod people into saving themselves.

    I do not believe that punishment is the best way to do things. I believe it shows a failure on behalf of the parent / God to take more proactive measures. I ...[text shortened]... ar policy if you were a fully human dictator. ie shoot the 100 wealthiest citizens once a year.[/b]
    You just don't quite seem to have a grasp of this concept yet. My smiting the 100 richest people, in and of itself, is not designed to solve anything. The purpose is to 'motivate' people to solve the problem themselves. If people subsequently decide to implement higher taxes for the rich or enact universal health care, then that is all well and good. If they can lessen inequality and eliminate starvation by other means, then so be it. It would be up to the people to devise solutions to their own problems. My purpose as a god would be to make sure they recognize that there is a problem in the first place and that it had better be solved by some means. Or the smitings will continue indefinitely.

    I target the rich, not because smiting them will result in any meaningful wealth redistribution, but because they are in a position to enact substantive changes to how social institutions are run. If they are in imminent danger of being smitten then their motivation for enacting progressive change is heightened considerably. Of their own accord they would redistribute enough wealth to, if nothing else, avoid future smitings.

    The program I have outlined here is wholly incompatible with human governments. It is designed exclusively to fit within the parameters of this thread...if I were a god.
  2. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    06 Mar '10 13:52
    Originally posted by rwingett
    If they are in imminent danger of being smitten then their motivation for enacting progressive change is heightened considerably. Of their own accord they would redistribute enough wealth to, if nothing else, avoid future smitings.
    And my argument is that if human nature and current situations are anything to go by, it simply would not work. I simply don't believe that the threat of a smiting for excessive wealth would be very effective as a motivation for anything good. It would probably only result in people avoiding accumulating excessive wealth, which in and of itself would not particularly benefit anyone.

    The program I have outlined here is wholly incompatible with human governments. It is designed exclusively to fit within the parameters of this thread...if I were a god.
    But since you would largely not interfere except for your once a year smitings, human governments would still have to remain in place.
  3. Donationrwingett
    Ming the Merciless
    Royal Oak, MI
    Joined
    09 Sep '01
    Moves
    27626
    06 Mar '10 15:39
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    And my argument is that if human nature and current situations are anything to go by, it simply would not work. I simply don't believe that the threat of a smiting for excessive wealth would be very effective as a motivation for anything good. It would probably only result in people avoiding accumulating excessive wealth, which in and of itself would not ...[text shortened]... re except for your once a year smitings, human governments would still have to remain in place.
    I do not believe that 'human nature' has a fixed character. I believe that humans are eminently improvable. If people behave as greedy louts it is because they are born and bred into a system that rewards greed. If they are instead raised in a system where the rich and powerful are actively subjected to divine punishment then they will internalize an entirely different code of behavior.

    Human governments would be a necessity for the foreseeable future, yes. The smiting business is reserved exclusively for me (god), however. The leaders of governments which killed their own citizens would in turn be smitten. As with opulent displays of wealth, bad governance would also be a smitable crime. At year's end, not only would the richest be smitten, but the worst of the world's leaders would receive the same fate. There would actually be several categories where the worst offenders would be smitten. The cumulative effect would be the gradual improvement of the human race to the point where not only are governments unnecessary, but my services as a god are no longer required. Humanity will behave in a righteous fashion, not because they fear divine punishment, but because they have internalized that mode of behavior to such an extent that it becomes second nature to them. At that point they will have grown up and become as gods themselves. As a god, I will have no further purpose and will then cease to exist.

    I hope that expanded glimpse of my theology clears things up for you.
  4. Subscriberjosephw
    Owner
    Scoffer Mocker
    Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    9958
    06 Mar '10 19:411 edit
    Originally posted by whodey
    If you were God, how would you run things? Would you punish evil doers or would you turn a blind eye? If you did punish evil doers, how would you punish them? Would you erradicate free will? Who would go to heaven and who would go to hell? Would there even be a hearven or hell?
    I'd screw it all up!
  5. Subscriberjosephw
    Owner
    Scoffer Mocker
    Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    9958
    06 Mar '10 19:46
    Originally posted by josephw
    I'd screw it all up!
    Not really.

    I'd become a man so I could die for the sins of the world, so that whoever would simply trust and believe would get to have eternal life.

    Ya! That's what I'd do. 🙂
  6. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    Shoot the Squatters?
    tinyurl.com/43m7k8bw
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    06 Mar '10 21:44
    Originally posted by josephw
    Not really.

    I'd become a man so I could die for the sins of the world, so that whoever would simply trust and believe would get to have eternal life.

    Ya! That's what I'd do. 🙂
    I think I'd transform everyone into ducks for the sins of the world, so that whoever flaps their wings would get to have eternal life.
  7. Donationrwingett
    Ming the Merciless
    Royal Oak, MI
    Joined
    09 Sep '01
    Moves
    27626
    06 Mar '10 21:48
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    I think I'd transform everyone into ducks for the sins of the world, so that whoever flaps their wings would get to have eternal life.
    Would we all walk around shouting, "Aflac!"?
  8. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    The Axe man
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    102622
    06 Mar '10 22:26
    Of course God is the all, the everything. A passive principle whereby She doesn't actually do anything except empower more active entities to do stuff.(Even that is a gross oversimplification)
  9. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    Shoot the Squatters?
    tinyurl.com/43m7k8bw
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    07 Mar '10 02:351 edit
    Originally posted by rwingett
    Would we all walk around shouting, "Aflac!"?
    Ha! You got me cracking up. I have visions of crowds of ducks flapping and 'Aflac'ing at each other.

    For eternity.

    😛
  10. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    07 Mar '10 15:29
    100 posts on my thread!!

    That's all, just going for an all time record. Carry on.
  11. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    Shoot the Squatters?
    tinyurl.com/43m7k8bw
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    07 Mar '10 15:57
    Originally posted by whodey
    100 posts on my thread!!

    That's all, just going for an all time record. Carry on.
    AFLAC!!!!!
  12. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    07 Mar '10 19:27
    Originally posted by rwingett
    The cumulative effect would be the gradual improvement of the human race to the point where not only are governments unnecessary, but my services as a god are no longer required.
    I am curious. Do you think that if a God could do it with a little nudging here and there, that a benevolent dictator could achieve the same thing?
  13. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    07 Mar '10 19:30
    Originally posted by whodey
    100 posts on my thread!!

    That's all, just going for an all time record. Carry on.
    And still the picture looks a whole lot brighter with atheists in charge. It seems Christians are typically just not very nice people. Almost every atheist has at least suggested what he believes would make the world a better place. Christians have either made fun of the whole idea, abstained, or threatened to make a total mess of things.
  14. Subscriberjosephw
    Owner
    Scoffer Mocker
    Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    9958
    08 Mar '10 02:44
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    And still the picture looks a whole lot brighter with atheists in charge. It seems Christians are typically just not very nice people. Almost every atheist has at least suggested what he believes would make the world a better place. Christians have either made fun of the whole idea, abstained, or threatened to make a total mess of things.
    "It seems Christians are typically just not very nice people."

    Hey! I'm a very nice person. Really, I am.

    It's just that I'm not a very smart person, so I say things that aren't very nice sometimes.

    But I'd give you the coat off my back. 🙂
  15. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    08 Mar '10 04:58
    Originally posted by josephw
    But I'd give you the coat off my back. 🙂
    But would you if you were God?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree