Originally posted by whodey
I see, so African Americans are no better off today than they were hundreds of years ago. All that was done to enhance their lives up until this time can be considered nothing more than dung. There is nothing to build upon? Are you serious?
Yes I am serious. You're supposedly a chess player, and you should be looking at it from the point of view of strategy. If you played a completely reactive, defensive game, never once going on the offense and letting your opponent call all the shots, then you'd lose. Now consider if you were playing a game where the opponent got to write all the rules in his favor, and for a few hundred years had you chained up where you had to make moves for him when he demanded it and no moves to further your own interest. Ameliorating the de jure inequality of the game is not enough, but once you've done that, where does your strategy of passive 'resistance' get you? You now have nobody to petition, nobody to march on, etc. etc. so what now? In the case of the civil rights movement, you dissipate into irrelevancy until you can no longer sustain any sort of political profile at all, while the inequitable system goes merrily on its way.
You know its funny that you bring up the Jews. They have encountered oppression since they were held captive as slaves in Egypt for about 400 years or so.
Never happened. Read Finkelstein and Silberman's The Bible Unearthed.
Then they fought their way into the Holy Land and then were routinely invaded and finally led away into captivity and ended up being spread throughout Europe.
Or they moved into areas which had already been abandoned.
They then encountered various persecutions within Europe being made second class citizens and being exhiled from various antisemetic countries and even being murdered in large numbers. Then all of the hatred towards the Jews climaxed during the Holocaust killing millions.
Yes it did. And I applaud the uprisings in Warsaw, Sobribor, and Auschwitz which raised the cost to their oppressors, diverted Nazi attention, and may have ended up saving thousands by slowing the Nazi death machine.
God forbid they would want a home land of some kind to go to.
I have no problem with them having a home land of some kind to go to. I merely object to them starving Palestinians, establishing an apartheid state, massacreing them, etc.
Now they are being threatened by other countries to be cast into the sea!
On the contrary, the people most likely to be cast into the sea would be the Palestinians, except in certain reservations to be employed as cheap labor. Have you ever been to Israel? It's a cross between oasis and desert, and strangely enough the Israelis have the oasis and the Palestinians the unproductive desert every time, even when the oasis part is over the 1967 borders (let alone the 1948).
I think you will find oppression ONLY among people you seem to care about such as gays/Palestinians/etc. Everyone else, such as the Jews, can just all go to hades.
Palestinians are not allowed to drive on the paved roads. They have to drive on dangerous dirt roads. They get shot at when they fish in Gazan waters, even though Gaza is allegedly "theirs", Israeli military boats blockade the Gazan waters, Israeli airplanes block Gaza's sky, and then they can't even drive on main roads that cut through the heart of their territory. They have to pay the Israelis for their water, while the settlers build houses and pools with Palestinian labor, and yet the Palestinians can't get any money of theirs from their exports (which have to go through the Israeli Customs system). Children throwing stones can be shot from tanks, there's an apartheid wall built over the internationally-agreed 1967 boundaries, and while the media worldwide complains that Hamas won't recognize Israel, nobody ever asks why they should since Israel doesn't recognize Palestine.
Go to Palestine, look at the sum total of that and much more, and then come back and tell me with a straight face that the Israelis are the oppressed ones.
And stop equating Jews with Israel. They are not one and the same.
So tell me, when does oppression end and for whom?
When we all agree to respect the autonomy of the individual and reorganize society into horizontal, non-hierarchical, and non-oppressive structures.
Has there ever been a time when oppression was nonexistent?
I don't know. There are times when oppressing others was harder, though, when societies came together by commitment to these non-authoritarian principles, as in utopian communities in America and Britain, or Makhno's Ukraine, the Shinmin Autonomous Region in Korea, etc.
Where is your Utopia other than in your imagination?
It's everywhere that people decide to converge in societies of non-hierarchical, non-authoritarian, egalitarian societies.
You see oppression is just a byproduct of our fallen nature.
*chortle* I can just see that as a defense at the International Criminal Court: the magic fruit made me do it!
You have three options for fighting such oppression. You can ignore it, fight it peacefully, or fight it with physical violence. I assume you prefer the later?
Actually, I prefer a mix of two and three. In some cases, establishing a free clinic or a Food Not Bombs may be as powerful as a Molotov cocktail. However, I do not irrationally commit myself to pacifism alone, thereby giving the state and large corporations a monopoly on violence, and tipping the balance of power so far in favor of the state that it's only possible to approach the state as a supplicant, on bended knee and with hat in hand.
So be it, and let me know where it gets you much like your Palestinian counterparts. Send your children out to blow themselves up in the streets to fight for your cause and then get back to me and tell me how much progress has been made.
If you really think that fighting fire with fire works, why is it that blacks seem to be better off today than they were 50 years ago compared to Palestinians who seem to be worse off than they were 50 years ago?
The presence of the Israeli state. However, as I said before, the mere persistence of Palestinians shows the efficacy of violent resistance. The Israelis have no use for the Palestinians, but they have a lot of use for their land, the same dynamic that played itself out in New Zealand, Australia, the United States, Africa, etc. The only reason that the Palestinians haven't joined a whole host of vanished indigenous peoples is because they resist Israeli incursions into their land with force.
Whereas, while Palestinians' lives are small and a matter of indifference to the Israelis, and blacks' lives are a matter of indifference to whites (see: natural disasters, subheading "Hurricanes Katrina and Rita" ), there are tens of millions of black people, and they're very much integrated into the United States and couldn't be gotten rid of as the Israelis tried to do to the Palestinians in the Deir Yassin Massacre without a genocide of unimaginable proportions. Therefore, it suits the state to make a deal: a few throwaway concessions which don't change the racist dynamic of society, and meanwhile these 'successes' dissipate black energy and anger until the civil rights movement as a whole is a dead letter.