Go back
Incomes relative to Religions in USA.

Incomes relative to Religions in USA.

Spirituality

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Ill be waiting, in my office. Our lawyers are Jehovahs Witnesses, not some big shot lawyers, in it for the money. BTW did you notice how much the plaintiff asked for in compensation, originally? and she wasn't in it for the money. Neeext.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Someone sneering at a victim of sexual abuse on a 'Spirituality' forum. Whatever next?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Someone sneering at a victim of sexual abuse on a 'Spirituality' forum. Whatever next?
tell me, have I not consistently stated that it is regrettable and also tell me, what facial expressions and tone of voice indicators led you to the conclusion that i am sneering, again your evidence please.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
tell me, have I not consistently stated that it is regrettable and also tell me, what facial expressions and tone of voice indicators led you to the conclusion that i am sneering, again your evidence please.
Your post struck me as sneering, robbie. You have my first hand eye-witness testimony.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Your post struck me as sneering, robbie. You have my first hand eye-witness testimony.
answer the questions FMF, your evidence,

have i not consistently stated that the action is regrettable

what evidence have you that I am sneering

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
answer the questions FMF, your evidence,

have i not consistently stated that the action is regrettable

what evidence have you that I am sneering
The post immediately prior to the one where I described you as sneering at the victim of sexual abuse. I don't need you to agree with me, robbie.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Your post struck me as sneering, robbie. You have my first hand eye-witness testimony.
again your perceptions and personal testimony are meaningless, you are not a reliable witness and provide no empirical evidence ever to back up any of your claims. we are simply expected to give credence to your opinions simply because you say they are valid. Its a counterfeit currency which has absolutely no value in establishing any kind of truth and is meaningless to anyone but you.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
The post immediately prior to the one where I described you as sneering at the victim of sexual abuse. I don't need you to agree with me, robbie.
again what evidence have you FMF, answer the question, have i not consistently stated that the action is regrettable, yes or no,

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
again your perceptions and personal testimony are meaningless, you are not a reliable witness and provide no empirical evidence ever to back up any of your claims.
The "evidence" is your post at the bottom of page 16. It's sneering.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
The "evidence" is your post at the bottom of page 16. It's sneering.
I don't think it is and given the fact that I have consistently stated, in this thread, that the action is regrettable, i have a personal body of testimony to back up my claim, now your evidence, if you please.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
again what evidence have you FMF, answer the question, have i not consistently stated that the action is regrettable, yes or no,
Which 'action' are you specifically talking about here? Are you talking about McKendricks 'action' or the Watchtowers 'action'?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I don't think it is and given the fact that I have consistently stated, in this thread, that the action is regrettable, i have a personal body of testimony to back up my claim, now your evidence, if you please.
You did not state that "the action is regrettable" in your sneering, misanthropic, petulant post at the bottom of page 16. Others will make what they will of your posts on the last few pages [including the one about the motivations of the victim of sexual abuse], just as I have.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
You did not state that "the action is regrettable" in your sneering, misanthropic, petulant post at the bottom of page 16. Others will make what they will of your posts on the last few pages [including the one about the motivations of the victim of sexual abuse], just as I have.
again your opinions are meaningless, you have no evidence other than your self certified opinions that i was sneering and once again we are meant to give credence to those because well, you say so. Have i not throughout this thread stated that the action is regrettable, please answer the question.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
again your opinions are meaningless, you have no evidence other than your self certified opinions that i was sneering and once again we are meant to give credence to those because well, you say so. Have i not throughout this thread stated that the action is regrettable, please answer the question.
Your post at the bottom of page 16 is you sneering at a victim of sexual abuse. I do not need you to admit it. Others can give my take on it what credence they want.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Which 'action' are you specifically talking about here? Are you talking about McKendricks 'action' or the Watchtowers 'action'?
I am not questioning the motives of the plaintiff but simply why the original claim was so large. I am not stating that abuse has not occurred, i am not stating that it is not regrettable that it has occurred, i am simply trying to ascertain why the original claim was so much.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.