Incomes relative to Religions in USA.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
i heard it was for something in the region of $ 100,000,000, but cannot confirm it. The case is really quite interesting,

have any other secular or religious organization, then or now, ever been legally required to make a public announcement of a congregant's specific sexual misdeeds.

i heard it was for something in the region of $ 100,000,000, but cannot confirm it.

Are you offering me unsubstantiated, self-certified, speculation here Rob? I wan't empirical data please, not some half arsed 'i heard it was' nonsense.

Originally posted by FMF
Whether they agree with my opinion is for others to decide for themselves, robbie.

meaningless and tedious, clearly opinion is important to you FMF, your own and that of others, without evidence, its actually meaningless.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
[b]i heard it was for something in the region of $ 100,000,000, but cannot confirm it.

Are you offering me unsubstantiated, self-certified, speculation here Rob? I wan't empirical data please, not some half arsed 'i heard it was' nonsense.[/b]

ok, ill try and find something more substantial and yes i agree, its unsubstantiated at this time.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
meaningless and tedious, clearly opinion is important to you FMF, your own and that of others, without evidence, its actually meaningless.

The "evidence" is your post at the bottom of page 16. If you don't accept it, it's fine by me.

Originally posted by FMF
The "evidence" is your post at the bottom of page 16. If you don't accept it, it's fine by me.

have i or have i not throughout this thread, up until your claim of sneering on a comment i made on page 16, stated that the action was regrettable. If you please.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
ok, ill try and find something more substantial and yes i agree, its unsubstantiated at this time.

ok, i can find nothing.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
have i or have i not throughout this thread, up until your claim of sneering on a comment i made on page 16, stated that the action was regrettable. If you please.

I am talking about your post at the bottom of page 16. I found it to be sneering.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
have i or have i not throughout this thread, up until your claim of sneering on a comment i made on page 16, stated that the action was regrettable. If you please.

Which 'action' are you talking about specifically?

Originally posted by FMF
I am talking about your post at the bottom of page 16. I found it to be sneering.

answer the question.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Which 'action' are you talking about specifically?

The alleged abuse.

Please answer this question, have any other secular or religious organization, then or now, ever been legally required to make a public announcement of a congregant's specific sexual misdeeds.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The alleged abuse.

Please answer this question, have any other secular or religious organization, then or now, ever been legally required to make a public announcement of a congregant's specific sexual misdeeds.

'Alleged abuse'?????

She just won a court case, in a court of law and you still claim it's 'alleged abuse'??

Originally posted by Proper Knob
'Alleged abuse'?????

She just won a court case, in a court of law and you still claim it's 'alleged abuse'??

yes, i have not read all the testimony and until i do everything is alleged, O.J. Simpson also won a court case, it proves, nada. Now please answer my question.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
answer the question.

Your mutterings about "regrettable action"? What I have been getting from you, robbie, on the latter part of this thread, culminating in your sneering comment about the sex abuse victim, has been mostly a kind of inchoate anger and hyper-defensiveness. You also seem to have been fumbling, grasping and being nonsensical - like with the reference to O.J.Simpson.

The sneering at the bottom of page 16 and stuff like the O.J.Simpson 'legal precedent' whatnot, place a question mark over the sincerity of everything
you have said on this matter, at least to my way of thinking. That's my answer to your question. And I say this in good faith and without rancour.

Originally posted by FMF
Your mutterings about "regrettable action"? What I have been getting from you, robbie, on the latter part of this thread, culminating in your sneering comment about the sex abuse victim, has been mostly a kind of inchoate anger and hyper-defensiveness. You also seem to have been fumbling, grasping and being nonsensical - like with the reference to O.J.Simpson.
nking. That's my answer to your question. And I say this in good faith and without rancour.

answer the question, your opinions on my character are meaningless to me. In fact, i don't even bother to read them, to be honest.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
answer the question, your opinions on my character are meaningless to me. In fact, i don't even bother to read them, to be honest.

See my post above. That is my answer to your question.