Originally posted by KellyJay
I read what was there, it seems to me all that was done in the part of
the artical I read, that was free was restate what evolutionist believe,
which doesn't move the chains as far as I'm concern. Your explaination
leaves a lot to be desired too, having pieces show up piece meal then
later find a way to contect just seems a bit much for me.

It is as ...[text shortened]... changes can take away good
things more than likely easier than give you more good ones.
Kelly

Yes but you don't start out with something as complex as an eye and then retrograde down to individual light sensors. Rudimentary light sensors are already in such forms as jellyfish which has no central nervous system at all, yet it reacts to light.