@fmf saidYou tell me. What would it matter to you?
What does it actually matter to anyone, aside from you, presumably, and perhaps to people who share your beliefs, that you believe in "a literal Satan"? What does it matter with regard to dealing with COVID-19 that you believe in "a literal Satan"?
@whodey saidI think more Americans will die because of this virus if perspectives like yours ~ bizarro superstition and facetious caricatures of people with whom you disagree ~ gain traction with the people in your country entrusted with the expertise and powers needed to try to save lives.
You tell me. What would it matter to you?
@fmf saidI never stated my opinions, did I?
I think more Americans will die because of this virus if perspectives like yours ~ bizarro superstition and facetious caricatures of people with whom you disagree ~ gain traction with the people in your country entrusted with the expertise and powers needed to try to save lives.
Troll threads don't interest me in doing so.
@whodey saidYou would do well (or at least better ) to not presume what progressive Christians believe. Your chances of getting it wrong near 100%.
Progressives don't believe in a literal satan. No, their belief is that the world is overpopulated, and as such, we had it com'in!
Their satan is random chance and our only deliverance is depopulation.
So in a way, whether you are of faith or a paganistic Progressive that dances naked around a camp fire at night conjuring demons they tend to see the situation kind of the same. It was a form of punishment either way.
@kegge saidThose two sentences you quote contain a "perhaps", a possibility, a guess. I'm not omniscient, so by definition, I do not know. However, it does follow my feeling that God does not "interfere" in our affairs anymore. Our bed is already made.
Why do you think viruses have no purpose anymore?
1 edit
@dj2becker saidI believe that sin (via free will, as you said) IS responsible for the overwhelming majority of suffering in the world. And a benevolent God has matters well in hand to end it [1]. But we're not quite to the tipping point yet (again, via free will), and so there must be more suffering ahead. The good news is that God's plan is not only until the end, but for all time after that.
If God and not sin (by means of free will) is responsible for all the suffering in the world, how do you reconcile that with His omnibenevolence? (Assuming of course that you believe omibenevolence is one of the characteristics of God)
[1]"And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely. He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son. But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death." - Revelation 21:6-8 KJV
"So stay thirsty, my friends." Haha, I couldn't resist. The line called out to me.
@suzianne saidI agree. Free-will is the only plausible explanation that I have seen that makes suffering compatible with a omnibenevolent God.
I believe that sin (via free will, as you said) IS responsible for the overwhelming majority of suffering in the world. And a benevolent God has matters well in hand to end it [1]. But we're not quite to the tipping point yet (again, via free will), and so there must be more suffering ahead. The good news is that God's plan is not only until the end, but for all time afte ...[text shortened]... the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death." - Revelation 21:6-8 KJV