-Removed-Sure.
Do you at least now get my point that there is no biological requirement for any species to ever have a low population? You may believe (not saying you do) that there was an actual Adam and Eve, but that is based on faith, not science. If it had ever actually happened then we would expect to see it in the genetics. We do not.
Secondly, in case you didn't get it when I said it before, there is no clear dividing line when species change. Its more of a continuum. There is no 'first population' of humans. There is only a continuous evolution from the ancestors of humans and chimps to what we see today. Species names are an artificial construct invented by humans for categorisation purposes.
-Removed-I do not refuse to accept any responsibility. I do accept that I play a part in our clashes. But I do maintain that the escalation in both recent clashes was initiated and maintained by you. And I suspect, that it was done so purely to avoid dealing with a difficult issue or a point where you knew you were wrong. Whenever I try to get the conversation back on track you deliberately derail it again.