12 Dec '17 12:05>
Originally posted by @eladarThat you cannot "discern" the Holy Spirit surprises no one. By no means does this mean that no one can.
Holy Spirit filled followers. Nothing else matters, but what human can discern the holy spirit?
Originally posted by @eladarThat you cannot "discern" the Holy Spirit surprises no one. By no means does this mean that no one can.
Holy Spirit filled followers. Nothing else matters, but what human can discern the holy spirit?
Originally posted by @suzianneIt would be to the betterment of the debates that go on here if you spent more time engaging what dissenters actually say - play the ball, as it were - rather than what you do choose to spend most your time doing.
Yeah, I know you get your jollies watching Christians fight, but if you missed it at the time, or it just wasn't "long enough" for you, then too bad. I don't dance to your tune.
Originally posted by @fmfYet only you are allowed to dodge questions that you find inconvenient to answer?
It would be to the betterment of the debates that go on here if you spent more time engaging what dissenters actually say - play the ball, as it were - rather than what you do choose to spend most your time doing.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerThe question that Eladar raised about the supposed racism and sexism of Jesus was not a question that was posed to me, and, not being a Christian, there'd be little point in addressing such a question to me. I didn't dodge anything.
Yet only you are allowed to dodge questions that you find inconvenient to answer?
Originally posted by @fmfI was not referring to Eladars question but I think you knew that anyway.
The question that Eladar raised about the supposed racism and sexism of Jesus was not a question that was posed to me, and, not being a Christian, there'd be little point in addressing such a question to me. I didn't dodge anything.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerIf you don't think I spend my time here engaging what dissenters ~ and people who disagree with me about things ~ actually say, then that is your prerogative. I would have liked to have seen Suzianne tackle Eladar's gimmicky little bits of Bible quoting. She says she did. I must have missed it.
I was not referring to Eladars question but I think you knew that anyway.
Originally posted by @galveston75You didn't read this very well. It is NOT in a regular bible. It was found recently and translated, with some lines missing because of deterioration of the script.
Could you show me where this is at in a regular bible? If it's not in the bibles most use today I have serious doubts in this.
Originally posted by @sonhouseFunny how you are interested in what should have been included in a religious text you reject.
You didn't read this very well. It is NOT in a regular bible. It was found recently and translated, with some lines missing because of deterioration of the script.
Here is the whole thing translated to English:
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/_pdf/GospelofJudas.pdf
This gospel was actually discussed at the council of Nicea and it was ...[text shortened]... t order. There was a version of the bible in the year 300 or so. Still hundreds of years later.
Originally posted by @eladarWhen it represents a dichotomy like that you bet I am going to show it around because religious people are programmed so well they think the bible was written by god. Seems to me they were 100% wrong when you can have the same person described 180 degrees apart in biblical texts.
Funny how you are interested in what should have been included in a religious text you reject.
Originally posted by @sonhouseAgain I believe in the bible completely from the first verse to the last. I have complete faith that the bible we have today is from Jehovah.
You didn't read this very well. It is NOT in a regular bible. It was found recently and translated, with some lines missing because of deterioration of the script.
Here is the whole thing translated to English:
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/_pdf/GospelofJudas.pdf
This gospel was actually discussed at the council of Nicea and it was ...[text shortened]... t order. There was a version of the bible in the year 300 or so. Still hundreds of years later.
Originally posted by @fmfYou just love the irony in most of the attacks you make on Christians here, don't you?
It would be to the betterment of the debates that go on here if you spent more time engaging what dissenters actually say - play the ball, as it were - rather than what you do choose to spend most your time doing.
Originally posted by @sonhouseYour view of religion or more specially the bible is just as Satan has planned for humans, confusion and doubt.
When it represents a dichotomy like that you bet I am going to show it around because religious people are programmed so well they think the bible was written by god. Seems to me they were 100% wrong when you can have the same person described 180 degrees apart in biblical texts.
Along with other tid bits like a man worth 50 shekels and woman 30. Sure, ...[text shortened]... ing the christian BS story from then on and I thank grandma all the time for liberating my mind.
Originally posted by @galveston75Your book is not the Bible that God gave us. Your book is a replacement that Russell paid people to write. And amazingly, it just so happened to follow already established JW doctrine.
Again I believe in the bible completely from the first verse to the last. I have complete faith that the bible we have today is from Jehovah.
Every prophecy that was foretold to happen up until today has happened just as the bible said it would happen whether you see that or not. There is no historical markers that have ever proved the Bible wrong, no ...[text shortened]... e in every letter of this book he's given us. How about your faith in it? Doesn't sound so good.
Originally posted by @suzianneI totally agree with you on this. Every thread is a carbon copy of the other once these guys suck themselves to it like a leach and suck the life out of everyone.
You just love the irony in most of the attacks you make on Christians here, don't you?
I suppose you don't actually think you yourself "play the ball" instead of the man. What you do is laugh up your sleeve because the gullible here believe your "talking points" (your attacks on others) are actually true and represent reality. Only those who manage to ...[text shortened]... n sonship and becker.
All you guys are doing is turning this forum into a colossal bore-fest.
Originally posted by @suzianneI engage people here, sometimes robustly, that's for sure. And I get some 'robust' back too. But I don't think what I do is "attack Christians". Do you make "attacks" on anyone, Suzianne?
You just love the irony in most of the attacks you make on Christians here, don't you?