Originally posted by @dj2becker
And so it shouldn't if you have no convictions of your own. 😵
You cannot answer properly in order to defend your absurd belief on objectivity as you perceive it, but, instead of studying a thing or two as regards this issue, you use again and again the same untenable string of thoughts at the thread “Objective morals do not exist”.
There, on page 10, you ask FMF: “I see you have once again dodged the question. Is rape objectively wrong? Yes or No?” and your next post is the following: “FMF you cannot even tell me that rape is objectively wrong, that says a lot about where your moral compass is pointing”.
Well, no question of yours is “dodged” –by nobody. I answered you here and there and at other threads. He answered you, like every single one of your interlocutors did as well. You simply do neither debate with your interlocutors, nor comprehend what they reply to you.
Why is that?
😵