18 Feb '07 18:56>
Originally posted by KellyJayInteresting decision. Can you explain a bit more why you find 1. moral and 2. immoral? In the first case, a life is saved by taking another life, which for me makes it very difficult to take a stance whether it's moral or not. I would definitely think it's moral if you'd force the mother away from the child, even using violence, but if you (intentionally) kill her, I am not so sure. In the second case, if you see the fetus the same way as a baby, you save a life without taking another life. You do something illegal, but if you seriously believe that you save a baby's life, shouldn't that justify your actions morally, even if you may be punished legally?
Murder is a legal term #1 can correct here if I’m wrong, but as I understand how it works when it comes to laws:
You legalize killing people or put up rules on when it is okay to do, it will than be the rules surrounding the killing that will make it murder or not.
So it will depend the laws of the land at the time both could be murder, both being mor ...[text shortened]... ecting the child from immediate harm is justified.
2. I'd call immoral, all of it sad.
Kelly