Originally posted by no1marauder
You must be joking to say I'm setting up a "strawman" when this entire post is one! Let's actually look at what I said:
The "Christians" here want everything tied up in a neat little package with a big bow and a label saying "Just for You and the Other 1% of the Special People". Plus they want to pretend that only they can understand w ...[text shortened]... have a "gripe against Christianity" and actually read and try to understand what I'm saying.
1. Do these "Christians" claim to be omniscient? If not, then they clearly acknowledge that "there may be things that Man ... cannot understand". If they don't claim to be omniscient, your argument doesn't work because they don't differ with "other spiritual belief systems" on the limits of human knowledge. The strawman is that your argument relies on the implicit premise that these Christians claim to be omniscient - which they don't.
2. Of course I deny its truth. No spiritual belief system I know of says "There
may be things we cannot understand in our current state;
perhaps we can understand them in another stage of being".
Pick any system - either it will say there
are (note the certainty!) things we cannot understand in our present state, or there
aren't. Either we
will be able to understand them in another "stage of being" - or we
won't. Zen, AFAIK, may be the only exception but, as I said before, I think one can derive positive assertions from what Zen denies.
3. Is it more rational to believe that all men have limited knowledge than one (or a few) have special knowledge? Let's consider the mathematics of quantum theory - is it more rational to believe than all men have a limited knowledge of QT than to believe that a few men have special knowledge of QT? Clearly not. So, of course, I deny its truth.