Go back
Lady Bishops

Lady Bishops

Spirituality


Originally posted by stellspalfie
[b]Pauls words are, 'I do not permit a women to exercise authority over a man'.


what positions within your church would be ones of 'authority'?[/b]
hey Spalf the Boro is going brill


Originally posted by redbadger
hey Spalf the Boro is going brill
Celtic v Rangers tomorrow 😀


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Recently the church of England appointed its first lady Bishop. It was heralded as a sign of the Churches progress. Similar ground breaking acts of its history were cited for example the break from Rome which although was done primarily because Henry VIII couldn't get a divorce from his first wife it did pave the way for the reformation in England, ...[text shortened]... Again this is simply an argumentum ad populum - many people affirm it therefore it must be good.
Go back to your cave, robbie.


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Recently the church of England appointed its first lady Bishop. It was heralded as a sign of the Churches progress. Similar ground breaking acts of its history were cited for example the break from Rome which although was done primarily because Henry VIII couldn't get a divorce from his first wife it did pave the way for the reformation in England, ...[text shortened]... Again this is simply an argumentum ad populum - many people affirm it therefore it must be good.
I reckon get more eye candy in to the churches with shorter cassocks high heels and a bit of cleavage the front row would be full of blokes like me.

1 edit

Originally posted by Suzianne
Go back to your cave, robbie.
try to address the content rather than the proposer. I understand its a typical emotive response though.


Originally posted by redbadger
I reckon get more eye candy in to the churches with shorter cassocks high heels and a bit of cleavage the front row would be full of blokes like me.
You need to go either Sufi or Southern baptist, they have snake dancers and everything.


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
try to address the content rather than the proposer. I understand its a typical emotive response though.
did you come back from your cave? she didn't say you can come back.


go back to your cave and stay there, robbie.


Originally posted by Zahlanzi
did you come back from your cave? she didn't say you can come back.


go back to your cave and stay there, robbie.
leave the ZEN MASTER alone DIMWAD


Originally posted by redbadger
leave the ZEN MASTER alone DIMWAD
thankyou great badger, do you see how incapable of rational thought they are? reasonable debate is almost impossible.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Recently the church of England appointed its first lady Bishop. It was heralded as a sign of the Churches progress. Similar ground breaking acts of its history were cited for example the break from Rome which although was done primarily because Henry VIII couldn't get a divorce from his first wife it did pave the way for the reformation in England, ...[text shortened]... Again this is simply an argumentum ad populum - many people affirm it therefore it must be good.
This is nothing new.

Almost all of modern society is anti-biblical. [and all the good bits]

All the progress made since the enlightenment in the west has been made by slowly
dragging the religious [Christians] towards secular moral values.

Even if they [either side] didn't know that was what they were doing.

We could make much better progress if this wasn't necessary.

2 edits

Originally posted by googlefudge
This is nothing new.

Almost all of modern society is anti-biblical. [and all the good bits]

All the progress made since the enlightenment in the west has been made by slowly
dragging the religious [Christians] towards secular moral values.

Even if they [either side] didn't know that was what they were doing.

We could make much better progress if this wasn't necessary.
Your statement is demonstrably false. Many of the social reforms were carried out by Christians directly motivated by their religious belief. The eventual abolishment of slavery, reforms to prisons, reforms to hospital and the setting up of many Christian charities. Clearly the present day moral morass that we find ourselves in is not because of Christianity but because of a lack of it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Your statement is demonstrably false. Many of the social reforms were carried out by Christians directly motivated by their religious belief. The eventual abolishment of slavery, reforms to prisons, reforms to hospital and the setting up of many Christian charities. Clearly the present day moral morass that we find ourselves in is not because of Christianity but because of a lack of it.
Yes, because the more secular and atheistic a place is the higher the rate of crime and violence...

Oh no wait, it's the other way around.


Just because they were Christian doesn't mean anything.

EVERYONE was [give or take] Christian back then.


What they did however was substitute their own innate moral intuition and rational thought
for the unrelentingly awful 'morality' espoused by the bible.

And as time passed what was classed as moral looked less and less like the tripe found in the
bible.

Morals became more and more something we decide as a people based on rational arguments and
our innate compassion and sense of fairness, [and eventually on objective measurements] and
less and less on the unchangingly wrong drivel of bronze age mystics.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
try to address the content rather than the proposer. I understand its a typical emotive response though.
Why? All of your "content" is the same stupid crap.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
This is nothing new.

Almost all of modern society is anti-biblical. [and all the good bits]

All the progress made since the enlightenment in the west has been made by slowly
dragging the religious [Christians] towards secular moral values.

Even if they [either side] didn't know that was what they were doing.

We could make much better progress if this wasn't necessary.
Oh, please.

The Episcopalian Church in America has had woman bishops since 1989. And the head of the church is a woman. Since 2009.

And we're FAR from "anti-biblical".


Originally posted by Suzianne
Why? All of your "content" is the same stupid crap.
Another failure to address the actual content. I suspect its simply easier to make such statements than to actually take the time to formulate something constructive.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.