10 Mar '06 23:36>
This whole dilemma arises from the delusion of the individual self. When we assume that our separate self is absolutely real, then we project this idea onto "God", and create the notion of a God as some exaggerated expression of individuality. Then, we have a God who "has powers", "can obey or disobey laws", has "personal characteristics", and so forth.
The Buddha deconstructed this whole illusory dilemma long ago. The root problem is the assumption that the individual self is real in any absolute or ultimate fashion.
The Zen expression, "show me your original face before your parents were born", addresses this root issue by directing the mind to search for the origin point of *identity*. (As does the koan "Who am I?", that the Advaita sage Ramana Maharshi used, for example). In time, it becomes increasingly clear that the issue of separate identity is itself the underlying problem. Once that is understood, any tendency to project separate identity onto our idea of God falls away. We give up the attempt to anthropomorphize and fashion God in our image and speculate on what God can or cannot do.
As with all questions about the absolute, there is usually no answer, there is rather only a deconstructing of the question and the presumed separate identity of the questioner. There is a line in one of the Psalms that speaks to this -- "be still, and know that I am". This "I am" is not a particular identity, as such, and thus cannot possess individual characteristics, like an ice cream flavour, or individual abilities, like a "talent" or a "capacity". It is simply pure Being-ness itself, pure infinite Presence in which all appearances of individuality are endlessly arising and falling away, like waves in an infinite ocean.
The Buddha deconstructed this whole illusory dilemma long ago. The root problem is the assumption that the individual self is real in any absolute or ultimate fashion.
The Zen expression, "show me your original face before your parents were born", addresses this root issue by directing the mind to search for the origin point of *identity*. (As does the koan "Who am I?", that the Advaita sage Ramana Maharshi used, for example). In time, it becomes increasingly clear that the issue of separate identity is itself the underlying problem. Once that is understood, any tendency to project separate identity onto our idea of God falls away. We give up the attempt to anthropomorphize and fashion God in our image and speculate on what God can or cannot do.
As with all questions about the absolute, there is usually no answer, there is rather only a deconstructing of the question and the presumed separate identity of the questioner. There is a line in one of the Psalms that speaks to this -- "be still, and know that I am". This "I am" is not a particular identity, as such, and thus cannot possess individual characteristics, like an ice cream flavour, or individual abilities, like a "talent" or a "capacity". It is simply pure Being-ness itself, pure infinite Presence in which all appearances of individuality are endlessly arising and falling away, like waves in an infinite ocean.