Life came from nonlife?

Originally posted by @fabianfnas
Really, KellyJay, you have to learn something about geology before you say that your guesses are all correct...

You know what happened billions of years ago, with as much certainty as what you ate last?

Originally posted by @kellyjay
You know what happened billions of years ago, with as much certainty as what you ate last?

Of course not. What is your point. Kelly, you are searching, but you don't have good survival skills. Question everything, find what works, and if I could give you the deepest wisdom possible, know that everyone is wrong.

Unlike religion, science doesn't claim to be right.

Originally posted by @kazetnagorra
What aspect of the scientists' methodology do you think is incorrect, and how would you improve said methodology?

You may feel you have all you need to know. That there is no way those making claims can be wrong so put your trust in them. I don't care what method is used or methods, since there is no way to invalidate claims that should always give pause. You can believe all the claims about the distant past you what, it is safe here no one can prove them wrong.

Originally posted by @kellyjay
No God creating life, is life from Life. He is all about life.

No, he's god of the afterlife. He is not here in the world anymore, if ever. And he isn't even the only god of the afterlife

Weird you don't even know your own indoctrination.

Originally posted by @kellyjay
You may feel you have all you need to know. That there is no way those making claims can be wrong so put your trust in them. I don't care what method is used or methods, since there is no way to invalidate claims that should always give pause. You can believe all the claims about the distant past you what, it is safe here no one can prove them wrong.

We can indeed prove claims about the distant past to be wrong. The earth is older than 6000 yrs, for example.

Originally posted by @apathist
We can indeed prove claims about the distant past to be wrong. The earth is older than 6000 yrs, for example.

Impressive

Originally posted by @kellyjay
... there is no way to invalidate claims that should always give pause. ...

There are NO claims that should not be given pause. Our methods of investigation should be ready to adjust, given new information or new ways of interpreting old information.

Originally posted by @kellyjay
Impressive

Not really. You were wrong to claim we cannot know what happened, that's all

Originally posted by @apathist
Not really. You were wrong to claim we cannot know what happened, that's all

I am wrong you know what happened 6 thousand years ago? Okay you know what happened 6 thousand years ago, and someone else here has knowledge about 5 billion years ago, impressive.

Originally posted by @apathist
There are NO claims that should not be given pause. Our methods of investigation should be ready to adjust, given new information or new ways of interpreting old information.

Just so we are on the same page if you know something is true it be validated not disproved with new data.

Originally posted by @apathist
No. Do you believe myth and faith is a reliable source of truth?

When you say no, obviously it is a lie.

Originally posted by @eladar
When you say no, obviously it is a lie.

Most of the 'lying' in this forum comes from you. Sir.

Originally posted by @suzianne
Most of the 'lying' in this forum comes from you. Sir.

Says the one who claims to be a Christian but supports killing unborn babies as well as supporting homosexuality.

There's a real winner there.

Originally posted by @apathist

Unlike religion, science doesn't claim to be right.

Bill when he was at the ark claims to be right.