Life came from nonlife?

Originally posted by @kellyjay
I am wrong you know what happened 6 thousand years ago? Okay you know what happened 6 thousand years ago, and someone else here has knowledge about 5 billion years ago, impressive.

So you are incredulous. An indication that you could use some of that education stuff. In order to make sensible arguments in the case you were right to be incredulous, if nothing else.

Originally posted by @rbhill
Bill when he was at the ark claims to be right.

Bill happens to be human. Science is not a human. Kinda a fine point,

Originally posted by @kellyjay
Just so we are on the same page if you know something is true it be validated not disproved with new data.

You got the cart before the horse. Knowledge should be driven by data, not the other way around.

Originally posted by @apathist
Bill happens to be human. Science is not a human. Kinda a fine point,

Science is defined by humans, therefore an extension of humans.

So in the end, what is science at times is based on human opinion.

Originally posted by @eladar
Says the one who claims to be a Christian but supports killing unborn babies as well as supporting homosexuality.

There's a real winner there.

Yes, she is a winner. Makes you look like a neanderthal with brain damage.

Originally posted by @apathist
Yes, she is a winner. Makes you look like a neanderthal with brain damage.

I am sure it does to the dead.

Originally posted by @eladar
[Science is defined by humans, therefore an extension of humans.

So in the end, what is science at times is based on human opinion.

Neither point makes sense. The first is laughable. We define what planets are and are not, therefore pluto is an extension of ourselves? That isn't even wrong, it's just stupid.

Your second point can be rehabilitated. Science does not depend on human opinion (the exact opposite, actually) but scientists are human and that brings a lot of baggage. Including frustration from dealing with ignorant people unaware of basic science facts. Reveal Hidden Content

Originally posted by @eladar
I am sure it does to the dead.

You are in the actual world here. I bet you have no special knowledge about the dead, and just farted as a contribution to discussion.

Originally posted by @apathist
You are in the actual world here. I bet you have no special knowledge about the dead, and just farted as a contribution to discussion.

It isn't special knowledge. But you are dead so you don't know about it. The knowledge is free for all who want it.

Originally posted by @eladar
It isn't special knowledge. But you are dead so you don't know about it. The knowledge is free for all who want it.

I don't buy your crud, so you squirm. Your crud doesn't work. There is another path open for you.

Listen to yourself! Are you talking to dead people? You parody unreason.

Originally posted by @apathist
I don't buy your crud, so you squirm. Your crud doesn't work. There is another path open for you.

Listen to yourself! Are you talking to dead people? You parody unreason.

I am definitely talking to a dead man.

Originally posted by @eladar
I am definitely talking to a dead man.

I just started the xombie series. May be you are right.

Originally posted by @kellyjay
I am wrong you know what happened 6 thousand years ago? Okay you know what happened 6 thousand years ago, and someone else here has knowledge about 5 billion years ago, impressive.

Don't you think it would be a good idea to investigate why people think they have good reasons to believe that something happened a long time ago, before dismissing it?

Originally posted by @kazetnagorra
Don't you think it would be a good idea to investigate why people think they have good reasons to believe that something happened a long time ago, before dismissing it?

Understanding the methodology would help as well.

Kind of like people who blow off global warming because "hey, last winter we had some of the lowest temps ever."