I was thinking about that and realised that whenever a baby is conceived that's a new life created. What will become incredibly complex if nothing goes horribly wrong, was created through a process that required no intelligence at all really. Why do religious people insist then, that an intelligence is required to create life?
(This is possibly the dumbest thread I've created yet, but my happy fingers couldn't resist.)
Originally posted by C Hess I was thinking about that and realised that whenever a baby is conceived that's a new life created. What will become incredibly complex if nothing goes horribly wrong, was created through a process that required no intelligence at all really. Why do religious people insist then, that an intelligence is required to create life?
(This is possibly the dumbest thread I've created yet, but my happy fingers couldn't resist.)
That is not life from non life, its life to life great C Hess, never the less when one examines even a single cell there is intelligence, harmony, design and purpose, a set of plans, a blueprint from the architect of life himself, Jehovah the father of the celestial lights. Does harmony arise from chaos? design by chance? We the poet theologians of the universe think it irrational and illogical to assume so.
Originally posted by C Hess I was thinking about that and realised that whenever a baby is conceived that's a new life created. What will become incredibly complex if nothing goes horribly wrong, was created through a process that required no intelligence at all really. Why do religious people insist then, that an intelligence is required to create life?
(This is possibly the dumbest thread I've created yet, but my happy fingers couldn't resist.)
And yet, intelligence is not required to create a new thread. 😉
Originally posted by C Hess I was thinking about that and realised that whenever a baby is conceived that's a new life created. What will become incredibly complex if nothing goes horribly wrong, was created through a process that required no intelligence at all really. Why do religious people insist then, that an intelligence is required to create life?
(This is possibly the dumbest thread I've created yet, but my happy fingers couldn't resist.)
To even suggest that there is no intelligence involved in the creating of a baby is pretty dumb.
Originally posted by C Hess I was thinking about that and realised that whenever a baby is conceived that's a new life created. What will become incredibly complex if nothing goes horribly wrong, was created through a process that required no intelligence at all really. Why do religious people insist then, that an intelligence is required to create life?
(This is possibly the dumbest thread I've created yet, but my happy fingers couldn't resist.)
A process that required no intelligence at all!? Seriously, how would you
know? A process that came from nothing that was able to produce a life
that complex is quite a leap of faith on your part. You trolling?
Kelly
Originally posted by C Hess I was thinking about that and realised that whenever a baby is conceived that's a new life created. What will become incredibly complex if nothing goes horribly wrong, was created through a process that required no intelligence at all really. Why do religious people insist then, that an intelligence is required to create life?
(This is possibly the dumbest thread I've created yet, but my happy fingers couldn't resist.)
Never mind life, I would like you to tell me where nonlife came from.
Originally posted by RJHinds To even suggest that there is no intelligence involved in the creating of a baby is pretty dumb.
I understand that from your perspective as a creationist, making a baby was no doubt on
par with a class in advanced physics (uh, it goes where you say), but to most people it's
more a matter of passion and irresistable urges than an intellectual challenge, making
babies. 😛
I'd say it takes slightly more intelligence to not make babies.
Originally posted by C Hess Why do religious people insist then, that an intelligence is required to create life?
Because, C Hess, the one and only authority on the subject of how life began is God, and He tells us how He did it right there in the only reliable source for knowing how life began, the Word of God, which is contained in a book we call the Bible.
Originally posted by josephw Because, C Hess, the one and only authority on the subject of how life began is God, and He tells us how He did it right there in the only reliable source for knowing how life began, the Word of God, which is contained in a book we call the Bible.
🙂
Yeah, I'd say that's a solid all right. I mean that book is a straight line between god's thoughts and your mind, is what that is. No interference whatsoever. Nope.
17 Aug '14 19:341 edit
Back to Top