Love thy enemy

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
I'm looking for a new 'enemy' in these forums. It just dawned on me today that with Hinds and Dasa gone, I like everybody who posts here. (Robbie doesn't count).

Okay, 'enemy' is a bit misleading, but I certainly require a Spiritual Arch Nemesis to pit my atheistic genius against. (Robbie doesn't count).

I will consider all applications for thi ...[text shortened]... rong in my atheism and to google such oddities and 'did Moses eat meat.' (Robbie doesn't count).

*thine

Originally posted by twhitehead
I live not far from some ostriches, so if you send me the money it will be cheaper. The main problem I see is the question of just how long I have to watch them. If they don't put their heads in the sand for over a month, can we conclusively say they never do?
And if I send you photo-shopped pictures like the one presented so far, will anyone believe it ...[text shortened]... ossibly a video, so we can say that lack of evidence is strong evidence of absence in this case.

No CGI's were harmed in NASA's depiction of two LIVE camel-birds (aka ostriches) sticking their heads into the sand.

Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
*thine

Why would I love my own enemy? What am I, Christian?

I kick thine enemy in the nuts.

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
No CGI's were harmed in NASA's depiction of two LIVE camel-birds (aka ostriches) sticking their heads into the sand.

Which one is you:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-nJufBw49HVg/UQv6WzN5EII/AAAAAAAAAO8/2eP144kxs7o/s1600/head+in+sand.jpg

Originally posted by twhitehead
Which one is you:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-nJufBw49HVg/UQv6WzN5EII/AAAAAAAAAO8/2eP144kxs7o/s1600/head+in+sand.jpg

lol Must be the chap with his head in the deepest.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Are the camel's humps in question spherical or flat? Quick recap:

1. You initially believed ostriches buried their heads in the sand.
2. You then attempted to wriggle out of your faux pas with an erroneous picture.
3. You initially believed the Earth was flat.
4. You then attempted to wriggle out of your faux pas by offering 12 million pounds y ...[text shortened]... pounds wouldn't be so concerned about his credit score!)
5. You have something against camels.

1. You initially believed ostriches buried their heads in the sand.
Categorically and demonstrably an untrue statement.
Firstly, I never indicated the position of the ostrich's head in relation to the sand in my initial suggestion of your likeness to the same.
Secondly, even if I didReveal Hidden Content, nothing within my statements is indicative of my beliefs.
Thirdly, two points ought to suffice at proving my point.

2. You then attempted to wriggle out of your faux pas with an erroneous picture.
No attempt at wriggling occurred; successful wriggling was clearly apparent.

3. You initially believed the Earth was flat.
Untrue.
Like you, I initially had no concept of anything remotely labeled "earth," or any shapes attributed thereof.
I simply wanted boobies.
Lots and lots of boobies.

4. You then attempted to wriggle out of your faux pas by offering 12 million pounds you don't have to send a rocket in to space. (A man with 12 million pounds wouldn't be so concerned about his credit score!)
The pound figure in question was nothing more than conjecture and tongue-in-cheek joviality.
Additionally, my accountant was relying on a favorable downturn in currency rates which would allow for optimization of delivery.

5. You have something against camels.
Only at midnight.
At the oasis.

Originally posted by twhitehead
Which one is you:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-nJufBw49HVg/UQv6WzN5EII/AAAAAAAAAO8/2eP144kxs7o/s1600/head+in+sand.jpg

I'm the blue-eyed one.
Which rump looked most inviting to you?

[please, please, please: don't say the blue-eyed one...]

Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
*thine

Wherefore woulds't thou question thine good friends grammar?

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
[b]1. You initially believed ostriches buried their heads in the sand.
Categorically and demonstrably an untrue statement.
Firstly, I never indicated the position of the ostrich's head in relation to the sand in my initial suggestion of your likeness to the same.
Secondly, even if I did[hidden]and I already said I didn't, as you and your legal repre ...[text shortened]... n of delivery.

5. You have something against camels.
Only at midnight.
At the oasis.[/b]

Can't believe you actually have me googling camel songs.


😠

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Can't believe you actually have me googling camel songs.


😠

"I'll be your belly dancer, prancer and you could be my sheikh..."

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
I'm looking for a new 'enemy' in these forums. It just dawned on me today that with Hinds and Dasa gone, I like everybody who posts here. (Robbie doesn't count).

Okay, 'enemy' is a bit misleading, but I certainly require a Spiritual Arch Nemesis to pit my atheistic genius against. (Robbie doesn't count).

I will consider all applications for thi ...[text shortened]... rong in my atheism and to google such oddities and 'did Moses eat meat.' (Robbie doesn't count).

Sob its sooooo true I'm insignificant! 😞

Originally posted by twhitehead
Wherefore woulds't thou question thine good friends grammar?

Thy good friend, surely?

Originally posted by avalanchethecat
Thy good friend, surely?

Shirley is whose best friend?

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Shirley is whose best friend?

Diana Barry!

Originally posted by twhitehead
Wherefore woulds't thou question thine good friends grammar?

No apostrophe. "Wouldst" is not a contraction. 🙂