Love thy enemy

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Sob its sooooo true I'm insignificant! 😞

'Bout time you came around to some reality.

Originally posted by Suzianne
No apostrophe. "Wouldst" is not a contraction. 🙂

Friends, on the other hand does need one.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
No, i'm sticking stubbornly to thy.

Are you applying for the position of my Spiritual Arch Nemesis? If so, you are a front runner. 😠

No, it's "thine" enemy.

Thine is used before words starting with a vowel sound, just like "an".

Thy is used before words starting with a consonant sound, just like "a".

Just so you know.

Originally posted by FMF
Friends, on the other hand does need one.

No, it doesn't.

EDIT: I actually jumped the gun with this response. So, yes, you are correct. In his post, "friend's" is a possessive.

Originally posted by Suzianne
No, it doesn't.

Surely it needs to be either...

Wherefore wouldst thou question thine good friends' grammar?

Wherefore wouldst thou question thine good friend's grammar?

Originally posted by FMF
Surely it needs to be either...

Wherefore wouldst thou question thine good friends' grammar?

Wherefore wouldst thou question thine good friend's grammar?

AND, the usage would be "thy good friend's grammar", not "thine good friend's grammar".

Originally posted by Suzianne
AND, the usage would be "thy good friend's grammar", not "thine good friend's grammar".

I am only interested in the punctuation. 😉

I'm still no closer to finding my Spiritual Arch Nemesis.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
I'm still no closer to finding my Spiritual Arch Nemesis.

Your spiritual arch nemesis hides in the darkness, slips and slides as he moves, he casts
doubt in all you do, and if possible would lead you to a quick destruction, he pretends to
be a great being of light and attempts to appear as one. He twists truth till it is something
else.

He also isn't one of us. 🙂

Originally posted by KellyJay
Your spiritual arch nemesis hides in the darkness, slips and slides as he moves, he casts doubt in all you do, and if possible would lead you to a quick destruction, he pretends to be a great being of light and attempts to appear as one. He twists truth till it is something else.

If this is supposed to be you finally speaking out and standing up to Dasa, I think you've left it rather late. 😉

Originally posted by KellyJay
Your spiritual arch nemesis hides in the darkness, slips and slides as he moves, he casts
doubt in all you do, and if possible would lead you to a quick destruction, he pretends to
be a great being of light and attempts to appear as one. He twists truth till it is something
else.

He also isn't one of us. 🙂

I don't know, you've described at least 3 people in this forum. 😉

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
I'm looking for a new 'enemy' in these forums. It just dawned on me today that with Hinds and Dasa gone, I like everybody who posts here. (Robbie doesn't count).

Okay, 'enemy' is a bit misleading, but I certainly require a Spiritual Arch Nemesis to pit my atheistic genius against. (Robbie doesn't count).

I will consider all applications for thi ...[text shortened]... rong in my atheism and to google such oddities and 'did Moses eat meat.' (Robbie doesn't count).

I'm up for it, but unfortunately I am neither for nor against the idea of "god".

I am totally against a notion of a christian god, ie. an entity that presides overall .

I do believe that "higher powers" that OCCASIONALLY assist humans and those people give them godly status.

But when I here of religious matters discussed it is always this black and white, god-no god arguement which to me misses the point of spirituality

Originally posted by avalanchethecat
Love thine enemy, surely?

Doesn't mean you can't pull them up on their silly ideas

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
I don't know, you've described at least 3 people in this forum. 😉

🙂 No, he isn't one of us and never was, and is actually out to get all of us.

Originally posted by karoly aczel
I'm up for it, but unfortunately I am neither for nor against the idea of "god".

I am totally against a notion of a christian god, ie. an entity that presides overall .

I do believe that "higher powers" that OCCASIONALLY assist humans and those people give them godly status.

But when I here of religious matters discussed it is always this black and white, god-no god arguement which to me misses the point of spirituality

Okay, you have made the shortlist. (Interview pending).