Love thy enemy

Originally posted by karoly aczel
?
Clarify please

It is problematic if my Spiritual Arch Nemesis likes atheists. (It's like Moriarty liking the violin).

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
That's only because you're blind as bat and thrice as ignorant.

Three points of my own sir:

1. Bats are not blind.
2. Ostriches do not bury their heads in the sand.
3. The Earth isn't flat.

Originally posted by karoly aczel
Initially I was calling myself "nothing" or "non-dualist".
I always liked the flavour of Buudhism, but never claimed to be a regurlar practising Buddhist.

Recently I have started calling myself "Hindu" for possibly better forum comprehension.
As for atheism , it relates to me like of Buddhism (no god).
If it were only atheists vs Christians I'd be atheist.

Hope this clarifies

So do you accept the polytheism of Hinduism?

(Is that the right word? Hinduism? )

Originally posted by karoly aczel
Well I do like atheists, and I collect bonsai(?)

Better than liking bonsai and collecting atheists!
Although I can envisage some on here who would
love a collection of atheist heads on their wall.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Better than liking bonsai and collecting atheists!
Although I can envisage some on here who would
love a collection of atheist heads on their wall.

My head is too big to fit on any domestic wall.

Originally posted by Suzianne
How To Win Friends and Influence People?

Merely goading him into taking me on as his spiritual nemesis.

You do see what I did there with his name, right?

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
My head is too big to fit on any domestic wall.

Fine an industrial wall will do for you moosehead.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Fine an industrial wall will do for you moosehead.

Robbie, off subject, but do you think JW is sexist? Male dominated that is?

http://freeminds.org/psych/leaving.htm

I see these reports and can't help but wonder it it's true.

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Merely [b]goading him into taking me on as his spiritual nemesis.

You do see what I did there with his name, right?[/b]

Alas, I worry sir that you are too unstable to be my Spiritual Arch Nemesis, and bearing in mind that the Earth is flat, I wouldn't want to push you over the edge.

.😏

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Alas, I worry sir that you are too unstable to be my Spiritual Arch Nemesis, and bearing in mind that the Earth is flat, I wouldn't want to push you over the edge.

.😏

Dear pretentious pagan apparition:
As has been previously established, Weebles wobble... but they do not fall down.
Plenty of stable up in here, yo.
Furthermore (and as you are well aware personally), your bents disallow any pushing; you are 'pull only.'

In retrospect, perhaps we are viewing this in complete opposition to its proper perspective.
Perhaps, instead of taking applications, you ought to be making application, namely, providing those of us who have obtained the desired eternal life a compelling reason for us to lower ourselves to the point of extending to the likes of you the same reward.
I mean, after all, what's in it for us, exactly?
Why should we try to save your measly soul?

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Dear pretentious pagan apparition:
As has been previously established, Weebles wobble... but they do not fall down.
Plenty of stable up in here, yo.
Furthermore (and as you are well aware personally), your bents disallow any pushing; you are 'pull only.'

In retrospect, perhaps we are viewing this in complete opposition to its proper perspective.
Per ...[text shortened]... .
I mean, after all, what's in it for us, exactly?
Why should we try to save your measly soul?

God and I have an understanding sir. At the age of seven it was agreed (by proxy) that I would live a godless life and pay him no heed whatsoever, but when I reached the age of 60 we would touch base and re-evaluate our relationship. I would then do a quick catch up and secure my place in heaven.

In short, my soul does not require saving. By becoming my Spiritual Arch Nemesis the fortunate individual will acquire associated notoriety and lifted out of the slum of oblivion.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
I'm looking for a new 'enemy' in these forums. It just dawned on me today that with Hinds and Dasa gone, I like everybody who posts here. (Robbie doesn't count).

Okay, 'enemy' is a bit misleading, but I certainly require a Spiritual Arch Nemesis to pit my atheistic genius against. (Robbie doesn't count).

I will consider all applications for thi ...[text shortened]... rong in my atheism and to google such oddities and 'did Moses eat meat.' (Robbie doesn't count).

Why doesn't Robbie count?

Originally posted by roigam
Why doesn't Robbie count?

Because his hands are so chubby he can't see his fingers.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
It is problematic if my Spiritual Arch Nemesis likes atheists. (It's like Moriarty liking the violin).

Ahhh, but can the devil not play a mean violin?
And would not you keep your enemies close ... and your so called friends closer?

And it's atheist thinking I like not the atheist.

Originally posted by Suzianne
So do you accept the polytheism of Hinduism?

(Is that the right word? Hinduism? )

Hinduism= all who consider themselves spiritual