01 Feb '11 11:44>
Originally posted by Agergbut you see Agers, its not only i who have noticed this unsavoury trend of yours, others are also concerned!
I made a thread for you to post this sh**, knock yourself out.
Originally posted by robbie carrobiethis of yours post belongs in Thread 137545
but you see Agers, its not only i who have noticed this unsavoury trend of yours, others are also concerned!
Originally posted by Agergdont worry i posted it twice, now to the accusation, that of the deceptive characterisation of others, how do you plead, guilty, not guilty or we could effect Scots law and you may get away with a not proven? do you plan to defend yourself or appoint a representative?
this of yours post belongs in Thread 137545
Originally posted by robbie carrobiethis post of yours belongs in Thread 137545
dont worry i posted it twice, now to the accusation, that of the deceptive characterisation of others, how do you plead, guilty, not guilty or we could effect Scots law and you may get away with a not proven? do you plan to defend yourself or appoint a representative?
Originally posted by Agergthe accusation remains Agers, regardless of where it is posted, refusing to face the facts will not make it go away. Is the bad ol putty cat afraid to face the charges? is he , dare i say it, cowardly? poor bad ol putty cat!
this of yours post belongs in Thread 137545
Originally posted by robbie carrobiethis post of yours belongs in Thread 137545
the accusation remains Agers, regardless of where it is posted, refusing to face the facts will not make it go away.
Originally posted by Agergmembers of the jury shall be told to disregard your vain protests and evasive steps, failure to either acknowledge the charges or to make a defence may be deemed as an admonition of guilt and you shall hence forth be known as a cowardly and deceptive slanderer who deliberately and deceptively engages in the defamatory characterisation of others! yes yes the thread belongs elsewhere, it is noteworthy that even in this regard you are trying to portray another in a deceptive and defamatory manner, the evidence is incontrovertible!
this post of yours belongs in Thread 137545
Originally posted by souvereinI don't really disagree with you given you qualify this with "usually" as opposed to "always". There are certainly some deceptive statements which serve the greater good with an economy that cannot be met by some other truthful statement. My issue in this thread has been the universality and generality of all lies being bad which certain theists tend to espouse - and I haven't actually been given an argument (beyond anything equivalent to simply reasserting the proposition) to support the position by those who hold it.
Lying is usually bad and almost always risky.
There is a festival with 100.000 people. A small fire starts. Public near the fire grab their phones and twitter it around. The danger of panic is immanent. The organization wonders about the best strategy. What should she tell the public?
1. Nothing
2. There is fire but they can handle it. (truth)
3. The ...[text shortened]... trustworthiness of the speaker in the future, even when the lie is done with the best intention.
Originally posted by robbie carrobiethis post of yours belongs in Thread 137545
members of the jury shall be told to disregard your vain protests and evasive steps, failure to either acknowledge the charges or to make a defence may be deemed as an admonition of guilt and you shall hence forth be known as a cowardly and deceptive slanderer who deliberately and deceptively engages in the defamatory characterisation of others! yes ...[text shortened]... rying to portray another in a deceptive and defamatory manner, the evidence is incontrovertible!
Originally posted by AgergKant would say that lying is bad, Mills would say that it is subjective. pick one
I'm sure not only Robbie Carrobie holds that lying is always bad (because the Bible says so); my question is why??? to this end perhaps someone will point out where in these examples telling the truth would be a better solution:
Dave: "Hi Greg!...how you doing?"
Me: (having only had a couple of hours sleep, am in a hurry to get somewhere Dave isn't, ...[text shortened]... rds his mum looking for more approval of his "talents".
Originally posted by AgergThere are certainly some deceptive statements which serve the greater good with an economy that cannot be met by some other truthful statement. My issue in this thread has been the universality and generality of all lies being bad which certain theists tend to espouse - and I haven't actually been given an argument (beyond gainsaying) to support the position by those who hold it.
I don't really disagree with you given you qualify this with "usually" as opposed to "always". There are certainly some deceptive statements which serve the greater good with an economy that cannot be met by some other truthful statement. My issue in this thread has been the universality and generality of all lies being bad which certain theists tend to espous ...[text shortened]... ton almost as quickly as it was delivered and long before the positive effect wears off.
Originally posted by AgergEvidently you believe your attempts to characterize my trying to get you to understand the points of my posts and/or trying to get you back to the points as something they aren't. Evidently it makes you "feel better" to do so and serve as examples of your ability to self-deceive.
On the contrary; I make no deceptive characterizations at all - I admire your diligence to the principles of circularity, economy of thought, and non too subtle insults. You have clearly surpassed all the brilliant fundies on this board such as RBHILL (et al) in this pursuit and you have my sincerest respect for this.
I genuinely lie down here in the creti ...[text shortened]... ift and philosophical genius that no other person has the capacity to understand or acknowledge.
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneYou always tell the truth presumably because you feel you have some objective duty to do this, this is done with the binary mindset that things are either black or they are white. You have not presented me with a rational argument to support your universal position other than it is true by your decree.
Evidently you believe your attempts to characterize my trying to get you to understand the points of my posts and/or trying to get you back to the points as something they aren't. Evidently it makes you "feel better" to do so and serve as examples of your ability to self-deceive.
This comes as no surprise coming from a guy who said this:
"Too right I' . That you so readily condone lying to children serves to underscore this point.